-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Nienberg wrote:
> Thanks, I'll have a look. Was it decided to leave the encoding the way
> it is for backward compatibility or will it eventually be done in the
> standard way?
I don't think anything was actually decided; consensus seemed to be
Hi Mark,
Mark Nienberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks, I'll have a look. Was it decided to leave the encoding the way
>it is for backward compatibility or will it eventually be done in the
>standard way?
A patch was proposed, which Kern will probably apply initially with a compile
option
Howard Thomson wrote:
Hi Mark,
There was a recent, i.e. within the last three weeks or so, discussion on the
bacula-devel list, about the 'standards' compliance of the base-64 encoding
in the Bacula source tree.
Kern Sibbald agreed that there was a bug in the implementation in the Bacula
so
