> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Gross [mailto:ralf-li...@ralfgross.de]
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 6:23 AM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] RFC: backing up hundreds of TB
>
Alan Brown schrieb:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Ralf Gross wrote:
>
> > Most files will be written once and maybe never been accessed again. But
> > the data need to be online and there is a requirement for backup and the
> > ability to restore deleted files (retention time can be different, going
> >
Kevin Keane schrieb:
> Just a thought... If I understand you correctly, the files never
> change once they are created? In that case, your best bet might be
> to use a copy-based scheme for backup.
Yes, the files won't change. They are mostly raw camera data. They
will be read again, but not chan
From: Ralf Gross [mailto:ralf-li...@ralfgross.de]
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 4:24 AM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Bacula-users] RFC: backing up hundreds of TB
>
> [crosspost to -users and -devel list]
>
> Hi,
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Most files will be written once and maybe never been accessed again. But
> the data need to be online and there is a requirement for backup and the
> ability to restore deleted files (retention time can be different, going
> from 6 months to a couple of yea
[crosspost to -users and -devel list]
Hi,
we are happily using bacula since a few years and already backing up
some dozens of TB (large video files) to tape.
In the next 2-3 years the amount of data will be growing to 300+ TB.
We are looking for some very pricy solutions for the primary storage
