Re: [Bacula-users] Quantum Scalar i40 and second tape drive

2010-02-15 Thread Alan Brown
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote: > > Because since Baculas mtx-changer is using mtx, I think I am not able to > > use the second drive. > > 1 - I would start with the OS and talk to your OS's mailing list > regarding this. I don't think using chio or talking to the OS mailing list will he

Re: [Bacula-users] Quantum Scalar i40 and second tape drive

2010-02-13 Thread shouldbe q931
This might be stupid questions.. What is the output from lsscsi ? What is the output from ls -al /dev | grep st ? Have/can you change the ID number of one of the drives ? Cheers Arne On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Kamm wrote: > Dear all, > > I need some hints, ideas whatever. I hav

Re: [Bacula-users] Quantum Scalar i40 and second tape drive

2010-02-13 Thread Dan Langille
Daniel Kamm wrote: > Dear all, > > I need some hints, ideas whatever. I have a Quantum Scalar i40 with two > separate LTO-4 SAS drives. I've conneced the drives with two SAS cables > to two separate SAS controller within the backup server. > > # cat /proc/scsi/scsi > Attached devices: > Host: s

Re: [Bacula-users] Quantum Scalar i40 and second tape drive

2010-02-12 Thread Alex Chekholko
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:59:46 +0100 Daniel Kamm wrote: > Dear all, > > I need some hints, ideas whatever. I have a Quantum Scalar i40 with two > separate LTO-4 SAS drives. I've conneced the drives with two SAS cables > to two separate SAS controller within the backup server. > > # cat /proc/sc

[Bacula-users] Quantum Scalar i40 and second tape drive

2010-02-12 Thread Daniel Kamm
Dear all, I need some hints, ideas whatever. I have a Quantum Scalar i40 with two separate LTO-4 SAS drives. I've conneced the drives with two SAS cables to two separate SAS controller within the backup server. # cat /proc/scsi/scsi Attached devices: Host: scsi4 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 Ve