Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problem on a Job of a filesystem with a lots of Files

2010-09-23 Thread Alan Brown
On 23/09/10 15:26, Andrés Yacopino wrote: > I think i am getting worst performance because of ramdon disk access > speed, is that true? > Yes. If you use the time command on your tar process you will find it is similarly slow. Actually it's not so much random disk access speed as the fixed tim

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problem on a Job of a filesystem with a lots of Files

2010-09-23 Thread John Drescher
> I need to improve performance of a Job which backups 150 files (mail > and File Server). > I was compressing the files on disk in some tgz files first (tar and > gzip) ,then backuping then on tape with Bacula, i was getting about: > > Job write elapsed time = 00:32:16, Transfer rate = 44.93 M

[Bacula-users] Performance problem on a Job of a filesystem with a lots of Files

2010-09-23 Thread Andrés Yacopino
I need to improve performance of a Job which backups 150 files (mail and File Server). I was compressing the files on disk in some tgz files first (tar and gzip) ,then backuping then on tape with Bacula, i was getting about: Job write elapsed time = 00:32:16, Transfer rate = 44.93 M Bytes/seco