Re: [Bacula-users] Odd problem with 2nd tape drive not being accepted

2007-06-01 Thread velociraptor
On 6/1/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Thanks for your response, and to the other folks. > > > > Storage { > > Name = DellTL4000 > > Description = "Dell TL4000 Tape Library" > > Address = 10.1.1.100 # N.B. Use a fully qualified name here > > SDPort = 9103 >

Re: [Bacula-users] Odd problem with 2nd tape drive not being accepted

2007-06-01 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 6/1/2007 7:04 PM, velociraptor wrote: > I'm having a weird problem with my tests of bacula for our install. > > For the most part everything was going well--my autochanger tests fine > using btape as do the individual tapes drives, basic job defs, clients > on two different OSes (Gentoo &

Re: [Bacula-users] Odd problem with 2nd tape drive not being accepted

2007-06-01 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:04:48 -0700, velociraptor said: > > I'm having a weird problem with my tests of bacula for our install. > > For the most part everything was going well--my autochanger tests fine > using btape as do the individual tapes drives, basic job defs, clients > on two differe

Re: [Bacula-users] Odd problem with 2nd tape drive not being accepted

2007-06-01 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 velociraptor wrote: > I'm having a weird problem with my tests of bacula for our install. > > For the most part everything was going well--my autochanger tests fine > using btape as do the individual tapes drives, basic job defs, clients > on two diff

[Bacula-users] Odd problem with 2nd tape drive not being accepted

2007-06-01 Thread velociraptor
I'm having a weird problem with my tests of bacula for our install. For the most part everything was going well--my autochanger tests fine using btape as do the individual tapes drives, basic job defs, clients on two different OSes (Gentoo & RHEL AS 4), etc. My director's OS is Gentoo 2.6.20-gent