net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
On 12/10/2009 9:33 AM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Here is a quick snap of my top during a full backup.
>
> top - 09:32:35 up 1 day, 18:38, 1 user, load average: 11.41, 11.60,
> 10.75
> Tasks: 161 total, 1 ru
On 12/10/2009 9:33 AM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Here is a quick snap of my top during a full backup.
>
> top - 09:32:35 up 1 day, 18:38, 1 user, load average: 11.41, 11.60,
> 10.75
> Tasks: 161 total, 1 running, 160 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu0 : 0.3%us, 0.3%sy
-
From: Steve Polyack [mailto:kor...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:37 AM
To: Hayden Katzenellenbogen
Cc: mehma sarja; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Here is a litt
AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009, Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> I started an 800G restore. Which is half of my 1.7TB backup.
>
> I ran iostat while it was restoring and was getting between 50 and 140
&
think the raid array
would be able to read faster than it can write.
-H
-Original Message-
From: Gavin McCullagh [mailto:gavin.mccull...@gcd.ie]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:38 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
On Wed
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009, Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> I started an 800G restore. Which is half of my 1.7TB backup.
>
> I ran iostat while it was restoring and was getting between 50 and 140
> Meg/s. I would say the average is around 85Meg/s.
Is that 85MByte/sec across the network or from local
-
From: Steve Polyack [mailto:kor...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:37 AM
To: Hayden Katzenellenbogen
Cc: mehma sarja; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Here is a little
Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Here is a little update. I finally after many months have been able to
> run my first restore.
>
> I started an 800G restore. Which is half of my 1.7TB backup.
>
> I ran iostat while it was restoring and was getting between 50 and 140
> Meg/s.
8:35 AM
To: mehma sarja; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
Mehma,
Sorry man wish that was the case. It was doing this on 3.0.1 and then I
decided that maybe an upgrade would help.
It was doing this when the database was on the local machine
: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
Ah HAH! The old "I just upgraded to bacula 3.03 this morning" mistake.
The problem here could be what happened to me. The database needs to be
bounced. Yes, indexes dropped and re-init-ed. It was a few moons ago and
I forget what exactly I did
Yup got one of those. It has saved my bacon once already.
-H
-Original Message-
From: Dan Langille [mailto:d...@langille.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 4:03 AM
To: Hayden Katzenellenbogen
Cc: Timo Neuvonen; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network
s.
>
> -H
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:30 PM
> To: Timo Neuvonen; bacula-users
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Timo Neuvo
Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> TiN,
>
> The write-cache is already enabled. Just checked. I have turned all the
> settings onto performance just in case. But looking at iostat it does not
> seem to have made any difference.
Write cache should only be enabled if the card has a BBU (battery bac
mehma sarja wrote:
> PLEASE BE CAREFUL:
> a. I do know I re-init-ed the indexes - I had to dump and reload the
> database and I re-init-ed it in the process.
> b. This is a delicate process and I played with it for many weeks.
This can be achieved without dropping the database. Indexes can
Ah HAH! The old "I just upgraded to bacula 3.03 this morning" mistake. The
problem here could be what happened to me. The database needs to be bounced.
Yes, indexes dropped and re-init-ed. It was a few moons ago and I forget
what exactly I did. Horribly slow backups and they NEVER finished and
no-
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:30 PM
> To: Timo Neuvonen; bacula-users
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Timo Neuvo
.
I must say I am at a total loss.
-H
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:30 PM
To: Timo Neuvonen; bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>
> "John Drescher" kirjoitti viestissä
> news:387ee2020912081330v6e8fa197s5009971859acb...@mail.gmail.com...
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
>> wrote:
>>> Yes it is a raid-6 configuration running on a 3ware 9690SA-8
, 2009 2:14 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
"John Drescher" kirjoitti viestissä
news:387ee2020912081330v6e8fa197s5009971859acb...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
> wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
wrote:
> Should it be set to no?
>
> Also can you have spool data on and spool attributes off?
>
Yes. But I was asking because the job will backup the data faster if
the attributes are spooled. The reason is without attibut spooling
every si
"John Drescher" kirjoitti viestissä
news:387ee2020912081330v6e8fa197s5009971859acb...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
> wrote:
>> Yes it is a raid-6 configuration running on a 3ware 9690SA-8I.
>>
I've never had this card, it should be powerful one I t
[mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:30 PM
To: Hayden Katzenellenbogen; bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
wrote:
> Yes it is a raid-6 configuration running on a 3ware 9690SA-8I.
>
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:30 PM
To: Hayden Katzenellenbogen; bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
wrote:
> Yes it is a raid-6 configuration running on a 3ware 9690SA-8I.
>
Do yo
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
wrote:
> Yes it is a raid-6 configuration running on a 3ware 9690SA-8I.
>
Do you have attribute spooling on?
John
--
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Searc
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
wrote:
> John,
>
> I have moved the database onto a dedicated server. I also added a SATA drive
> on a different controller for spooling the data. While the data is spooling I
> am seeing 9.5MB/s for writing to the spool drive. When it desp
.
Again any help is greatly appreciated.
-H
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:02 PM
To: Timo Neuvonen; bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network transfer Speed
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> "Hayden Katzenellenbogen" kirjoitti viestissä
> news:88bc6885d33a9d42a1ccb45e8749525ed15...@pigeon.sandiego.nextlevelinternet.com...
>> Everyone,
>>
>> I currently have a single server with 2.5TB of local data that I need to
>> back up. The p
"Hayden Katzenellenbogen" kirjoitti viestissä
news:88bc6885d33a9d42a1ccb45e8749525ed15...@pigeon.sandiego.nextlevelinternet.com...
> Everyone,
>
> I currently have a single server with 2.5TB of local data that I need to
> back up. The problem I am running into is that the server only has a
> 100M
Everyone,
I currently have a single server with 2.5TB of local data that I need to
back up. The problem I am running into is that the server only has a
100Mb/s network card so I am limited to 12MB/s of data transfer. I
thought using the loopback interface would give better speed but it
seems that
29 matches
Mail list logo
