Everyone, I currently have a single server with 2.5TB of local data that I need to back up. The problem I am running into is that the server only has a 100Mb/s network card so I am limited to 12MB/s of data transfer. I thought using the loopback interface would give better speed but it seems that I get identical results.
Is there a way to have Bacula read directly off the file system (not a raw partition) instead of relying on a network transfer. Has anyone had a similar experience with a creative solution. (This could be something obvious I have missed). I am currently running Bacula 3.0.3 (upgraded this morning) on Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. This server is running storage, file and director daemons. Thanks Hayden Hayden Katzenellenbogen hayd...@nextlevelinternet.com NextLevel Internet 858-836-0700 www.nextlevelinternet.com By the way, we are never too busy for referrals! If you know someone who might be interested in our services (Hosted PBX, Voice, Internet, Metro Ethernet, Co-Location) or who is unhappy with their current communications provider, we will take exceptional care of them! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
