Hugo Silva wrote:
> Bruno Friedmann wrote:
>> On 08/10/2010 04:13 PM, Hugo Silva wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlands.
>>> Using bacula, I can't seem to get past ~3000KB/s.
>>>
>>> Here's an iperf result:
>>> [ 3] local [fd-addr] port 166
Bruno Friedmann wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 04:13 PM, Hugo Silva wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlands.
>> Using bacula, I can't seem to get past ~3000KB/s.
>>
>> Here's an iperf result:
>> [ 3] local [fd-addr] port 16625 connected with [dir-addr]
On 08/10/2010 04:13 PM, Hugo Silva wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlands.
> Using bacula, I can't seem to get past ~3000KB/s.
>
> Here's an iperf result:
> [ 3] local [fd-addr] port 16625 connected with [dir-addr] port 5001
> [ ID] Interval
> Thank you for your suggestion (and sorry for not replying to the
> off-list mail sooner - forgot about it); with PKI off:
>
>
>em0 in 5.189 MB/s 5.206 MB/s 16.899 GB
> out 148.275 KB/s151.429 KB/s
> 508.40
On 08/11/10 11:34, Hugo Silva wrote:
> Christian Gaul wrote:
>> Am 11.08.2010 16:49, schrieb Hugo Silva:
>>> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>
Am Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:13:07 +0100 schrieb Hugo Silva:
> Hello,
>
> I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlan
>
> I had to disable the Maximum Network Buffer Size in the mean time,
> coincidence or not the director started throwing out "unknown errors"
> while connecting to storage, so this test is run with default buffer
> sizes (which shouldn't be a problem - I got 91-93% of the max link
> speed w
Steve Polyack wrote:
> On 08/11/10 11:34, Hugo Silva wrote:
>> Christian Gaul wrote:
>>> Am 11.08.2010 16:49, schrieb Hugo Silva:
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Am Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:13:07 +0100 schrieb Hugo Silva:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm backing up a server in Germany
Christian Gaul wrote:
> Am 11.08.2010 16:49, schrieb Hugo Silva:
>> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> Am Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:13:07 +0100 schrieb Hugo Silva:
>>>
>>>
Hello,
I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlands.
Using bacula, I can't seem to get
Am 11.08.2010 16:49, schrieb Hugo Silva:
> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
>> Am Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:13:07 +0100 schrieb Hugo Silva:
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlands.
>>> Using bacula, I can't seem to get past ~3000KB/s.
>>>
>>> Here's a
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Am Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:13:07 +0100 schrieb Hugo Silva:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlands.
>> Using bacula, I can't seem to get past ~3000KB/s.
>>
>> Here's an iperf result:
>> [ 3] local [fd-addr] port 16625 connected w
Am Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:13:07 +0100 schrieb Hugo Silva:
> Hello,
>
> I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlands.
> Using bacula, I can't seem to get past ~3000KB/s.
>
> Here's an iperf result:
> [ 3] local [fd-addr] port 16625 connected with [dir-addr] port 5001 [
> ID
Hello,
I'm backing up a server in Germany from a director in The Netherlands.
Using bacula, I can't seem to get past ~3000KB/s.
Here's an iperf result:
[ 3] local [fd-addr] port 16625 connected with [dir-addr] port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec110 MByt
Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The data will be sent blocked as defined in bacula-fd in each
> client. If the SD does not have the same blocking factor, you
> will either waste space (if the SD buffer is bigger) or the SD
> will do two reads to get a single FD block (if the SD buffer
On Thursday 08 September 2005 18:39, Maurizio Santini wrote:
> Thank you for your answer but let me rephrase the question.
>
> I have "Maximum Network Buffer Size = 65536" in bacula-fd.conf in the
> machine where the tape drive, bacula-dir.conf and bacula-sd.conf are,
> but Maximum Network Buffer S
I believe the "Maximum Network Buffer Size" should be less than or
equal to the OS's maximum socket send buffer size or maximum socket
receive buffer size, (whichever is smaller). 65536 should be OK.
You don't mention the sd daemon. You might first try turning up
"Maximum Network Buffer Size"
Hello,
Maurizio Santini wrote:
Thank you for your answer but let me rephrase the question.
I have "Maximum Network Buffer Size = 65536" in bacula-fd.conf in the
machine where the tape drive, bacula-dir.conf and bacula-sd.conf are,
but Maximum Network Buffer Size in bacula-fd.conf in the client
Thank you for your answer but let me rephrase the question.
I have "Maximum Network Buffer Size = 65536" in bacula-fd.conf in the
machine where the tape drive, bacula-dir.conf and bacula-sd.conf are,
but Maximum Network Buffer Size in bacula-fd.conf in the client machines
is set with the default v
Hello,
Maurizio Santini wrote:
Any hints on this?
nothing definite, sorry.
Thanks,
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 14:48, Maurizio Santini wrote:
Hi,
It might be a silly question but does the directive "Maximum Network
Buffer Size = " need to be set in any bacula-fd.conf (I mean all
clients) or on
Any hints on this?
Thanks,
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 14:48, Maurizio Santini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It might be a silly question but does the directive "Maximum Network
> Buffer Size = " need to be set in any bacula-fd.conf (I mean all
> clients) or only in the machine where the tape drive reside?
>
> Tha
Hi,
It might be a silly question but does the directive "Maximum Network
Buffer Size = " need to be set in any bacula-fd.conf (I mean all
clients) or only in the machine where the tape drive reside?
Thanks,
Maurizio
---
SF.Net email is Spons
20 matches
Mail list logo
