I believe the "Maximum Network Buffer Size" should be less than or
equal to the OS's maximum socket send buffer size or maximum socket
receive buffer size, (whichever is smaller). 65536 should be OK. You don't mention the sd daemon. You might first try turning up "Maximum Network Buffer Size" in bacula-sd.conf and leaving the client fd's as default. My guess is that this will increase performance when the sd is using multiple storage devices and so multiple clients are connected to the sd concurrently. Otherwise, it might not make much difference. In any case, if you have more than a few clients it would be a pain to change them all. After bumping up the sd'd buffer size and trying it with an fd set to the default buffer size, try changing just one fd's buffer size and see if it makes a difference. Maurizio Santini wrote: Thank you for your answer but let me rephrase the question. I have "Maximum Network Buffer Size = 65536" in bacula-fd.conf in the machine where the tape drive, bacula-dir.conf and bacula-sd.conf are, but Maximum Network Buffer Size in bacula-fd.conf in the client machines is set with the default value of 32768.Now, does it matter that the two values are different or bacula takes into account only the value of the configuration file where the tape drive is? Please let me know if the question is not clear enough. Thanks, MaurizioOn Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:13, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, Maurizio Santini wrote:Any hints on this?nothing definite, sorry.Thanks, On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 14:48, Maurizio Santini wrote:Hi, It might be a silly question but does the directive "Maximum Network Buffer Size = <bytes>" need to be set in any bacula-fd.conf (I mean all clients) or only in the machine where the tape drive reside?That's a question of network tuning, and to my experience the effects of different settings depend on lots of factors: Network load, network adapter hardware, machine load, switches, and all the other things you can tune in a network stack. I think you will either have to try different settings, or ask someone with a really good knowledge about your OSes and hardware and, especially, network systems. ArnoThanks, Maurizio ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users |
- Re: [Bacula-users] network performance Josh Fisher
- Re: [Bacula-users] network performance Kern Sibbald
- Re: [Bacula-users] network performance Arthur Emerson III