Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL versus Postgres

2011-06-06 Thread Alan Brown
On 07/06/11 02:26, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> Are there any performance implications for SSD's when they get >> fragmented? > > Not enough so to notice. I'll add this: the spool area is constantly being cleaned out so fragmentation never gets much of a chance to build up. As Phil says, it's most

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL versus Postgres

2011-06-06 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 06/06/11 20:57, James Harper wrote: >> >> A decent set of RAID0 SSD's for spooling/despooling data and will be > perfect!. >> > > Are there any performance implications for SSD's when they get > fragmented? Not enough so to notice. SSDs are direct access; no address takes any longer to access

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL versus Postgres

2011-06-06 Thread James Harper
> > A decent set of RAID0 SSD's for spooling/despooling data and will be perfect!. > Are there any performance implications for SSD's when they get fragmented? James -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technical

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL versus Postgres

2011-06-06 Thread Francisco Javier Funes Nieto
A decent set of RAID0 SSD's for spooling/despooling data and will be perfect!. J. 2011/6/6 Mike Seda : > All, > I'm still doing some testing with Bacula in my new environment. After > one week of backups, Bacula is storing approximately 25,000,000 files > (10 TB of data). Our other 5 TBs of data

[Bacula-users] MySQL versus Postgres

2011-06-06 Thread Mike Seda
All, I'm still doing some testing with Bacula in my new environment. After one week of backups, Bacula is storing approximately 25,000,000 files (10 TB of data). Our other 5 TBs of data is not in Bacula yet, but will be soon. Our 15 TB of total data will also grow by 50% each year. Postgres see