All, I'm still doing some testing with Bacula in my new environment. After one week of backups, Bacula is storing approximately 25,000,000 files (10 TB of data). Our other 5 TBs of data is not in Bacula yet, but will be soon. Our 15 TB of total data will also grow by 50% each year.
Postgres seems to be handling the current amount of data decently for us thus far. I just want to make sure that Postgres is the right choice (performance-wise) before I push forward with this solution. I recently read that Postgres is recommended over MySQL for larger Bacula installations. I just wanted to get your thoughts on that. BTW, the current environment lives inside ESX, but the new environment will live on a dedicated box with the following specs: - Dell PE 1950 III - 32 GB of RAM - 2 x 300 GB SAS 15K RAID 1 - 2-drive FC LTO-4 TL4000 library for copying File storage to tape - SAN-attached LUNS for spooling and File storage Thanks, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
