Re: [Bacula-users] Migration possible even with volume status "append"

2012-06-27 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:56:09 +0200, Mario Moder said: > > Thanks for your answer, this could explain it. Here is my migration job > config: > > Job { >Name = "migrate" >Type = Migrate >Level = Full >Client = bacula-fd >FileSet="Full Set" >Messages = Standard >Po

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration possible even with volume status "append"

2012-06-27 Thread Mario Moder
Am 26.06.2012 20:50, schrieb Martin Simmons: >> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:01:30 +0200, Mario Moder said: >> >> As the subject says: I have a pool with a file storage and a >> migration >> pool with a tape storage. The documentation says: "Volumes that are >> still marked Append will not be consid

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration possible even with volume status "append"

2012-06-26 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:01:30 +0200, Mario Moder said: > > As the subject says: I have a pool with a file storage and a migration > pool with a tape storage. The documentation says: "Volumes that are > still marked Append will not be considered for migration". > > I have a migration job wh

[Bacula-users] Migration possible even with volume status "append"

2012-06-26 Thread Mario Moder
Hi As the subject says: I have a pool with a file storage and a migration pool with a tape storage. The documentation says: "Volumes that are still marked Append will not be considered for migration". I have a migration job which does migrate from the appendable volume without an error. Could