Michael,
This is a work in progress and I'll keep everyone posted on what my configs
are once I know something works. I have re-compiled bacula with batch mode
turned on.
Yudhvir
===
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Michael Galloway wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:03:50PM +0100, Daniel Betz
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:03:50PM +0100, Daniel Betz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have the same problem with large amount of files on one filesystem (
> Maildir ).
> Now i have 2 concurrent jobs running and the time for the backups need half
> the time.
> I havent tested 4 concurrent jobs jet .. :-)
>
>
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> this may be good for Maildir, but with Cyrus IMAPD, which uses short
> filenames like "1432.", "1433.", this *reduced* performance by a few
> percent in one test we did.
How many files/dorectory were you testing with? In some cases our users
were
Daniel Betz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have the same problem with large amount of files on one filesystem (
> Maildir ).
> Now i have 2 concurrent jobs running and the time for the backups need half
> the time.
> I havent tested 4 concurrent jobs jet .. :-)
That would be a really nice feature to have
Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> Jesper Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Can you give us the time for doing a tar to /dev/null of the fileset.
>>
>> time tar cf /dev/null /path/to/maildir
>>
>> Then we have a feeling about the "actual read time" for the file of
>> the filesystem.
>
> if you're
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 15:42
> An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Large maildir backup
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> i did that already (expect the superblocks). I think it the ext3 itself
> in combination with the
Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ext3 will perform a lot better if you use tune2fs and enable the
> following features:
>
> dir_index
> Use hashed b-trees to speed up lookups in large
> directories.
this may be good for Maildir, but with Cyrus IMAPD, whic
Jesper Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you give us the time for doing a tar to /dev/null of the fileset.
>
> time tar cf /dev/null /path/to/maildir
>
> Then we have a feeling about the "actual read time" for the file of
> the filesystem.
if you're using GNU tar, it will *not* read the fil
Bacula-users] Large maildir backup
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Boris Kunstleben onOffice Software GmbH wrote:
> any idea if there is a better filesystem, im using ext3 on the clients
> and xfs on the director
I believe XFS copes fine with overstuffed directories.
Ext3 will perform a lot better if y
er, Stefan Becker
--
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Mike Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 14:43:46
An:
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Large maildir backup
Boris Kun
On Thursday 27 November 2008 16:29:50 you wrote:
> Silver Salonen wrote:
> > And when you have many incrementals in a row while restoring, you end up
> > seeing many duplicate messages, that have been deleted or moved during
these
> > incrementals.
> >
>
> For such case use snapshots - freez
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Boris Kunstleben onOffice Software GmbH wrote:
> any idea if there is a better filesystem, im using ext3 on the clients
> and xfs on the director
I believe XFS copes fine with overstuffed directories.
Ext3 will perform a lot better if you use tune2fs and enable the following
Boris Kunstleben onOffice Software GmbH wrote:
> any idea if there is a better filesystem, im using ext3 on the clients and
> xfs on the director
ext3 is possibly not a good fs for a Maildir. Can't offer you any personal
accounts, but I was looking at Google for something else regarding
filesystem
--
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 12:46:24
An: Boris Kunstleben onOffice Software GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Large ma
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Boris Kunstleben onOffice Software GmbH wrote:
> i am doing exactly that since last Thursday.
> I have about 1.6TB in Maildirs and an huge number of small files. I have to
> say it is awfull slow. Backing up a directory with about 190GB of Maildirs
> took "Elapsed time: 1 da
Hi,
27.11.2008 12:15, James Cort wrote:
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> - Tune your catalog database for faster inserts. That can mean moving
>> it to a faster machine, assigning more memory for it, or dropping some
>> indexes (during inserts). If you're not yet using batch inserts, try
>> to recompil
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> - Tune your catalog database for faster inserts. That can mean moving
> it to a faster machine, assigning more memory for it, or dropping some
> indexes (during inserts). If you're not yet using batch inserts, try
> to recompile Bacula with batch-inserts enabled.
Is that w
Hi,
27.11.2008 11:31, Boris Kunstleben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am doing exactly that since last Thursday.
> I have about 1.6TB in Maildirs and an huge number of small files. I have to
> say it is awfull slow. Backing up a directory with about 190GB of Maildirs
> took "Elapsed time: 1 day 14 hours 4
Boris Kunstleben onOffice Software GmbH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am doing exactly that since last Thursday.
> I have about 1.6TB in Maildirs and an huge number of small files. I have to
> say it is awfull slow. Backing up a directory with about 190GB of Maildirs
> took "Elapsed time: 1 day 14 hours 4
Hi,
i am doing exactly that since last Thursday.
I have about 1.6TB in Maildirs and an huge number of small files. I have to say
it is awfull slow. Backing up a directory with about 190GB of Maildirs took
"Elapsed time: 1 day 14 hours 49 mins 34 secs".
On the other hand i have a server with Doc
fan Becker
--
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 10:15:48
An: bacula-users
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Large maildir backup
On Thursday 27 Nov
er, Stefan Becker
--
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 10:15:48
An: bacula-users
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Large maildir bac
On Thursday 27 November 2008 11:07:41 James Cort wrote:
> Silver Salonen wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 November 2008 09:50:14 Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> >> Hello all!
> >>
> >> Soon I will deploy a large email server - it will use maildirs and will
> >> be about 1Tb of mail with really many small files
Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2008 09:50:14 Proskurin Kirill wrote:
>> Hello all!
>>
>> Soon I will deploy a large email server - it will use maildirs and will
>> be about 1Tb of mail with really many small files.
>>
>> It is any hints to make a backup via bacula of this?
>>
> I
On Thursday 27 November 2008 09:50:14 Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Soon I will deploy a large email server - it will use maildirs and will
> be about 1Tb of mail with really many small files.
>
> It is any hints to make a backup via bacula of this?
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Prosk
Hello all!
Soon I will deploy a large email server - it will use maildirs and will
be about 1Tb of mail with really many small files.
It is any hints to make a backup via bacula of this?
--
Best regards,
Proskurin Kirill
---
26 matches
Mail list logo
