Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-20 Thread Norbert Gomes
Hi Thank you for all your suggestions. We work currently with the distributions packages, and they are in 5.x version (in CentOS 7). But I saw that Debian Stretch will provide 7.4 version, it may be a good opportunity to migrate :-) Also, good idea to disable compression for some file extensions

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 02/18/2017 09:01 PM, compdoc wrote: > On 02/17/2017 10:18 AM, Norbert Gomes wrote: > >> I read that LZO would be faster, but when I enable it (compression="LZO" >> in the FileSet Include Options), no compression is applied > I use LZO to backup my jpeg images, that are stored on SSDs. I used to

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-18 Thread Mike Ruskai
On 2/17/2017 04:18, Norbert Gomes wrote: > Hi list ! > > GZIP compression is quite slow on our Windows clients (5.2.10), it > increases a lot the duration of theses backups. The speed of the network > transfer is at: 20 MB/s with GZIP and 100 MB/s without compression > > I read that LZO would be fa

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-18 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/18/17 15:01, compdoc wrote: > On 02/17/2017 10:18 AM, Norbert Gomes wrote: > >> I read that LZO would be faster, but when I enable it (compression="LZO" >> in the FileSet Include Options), no compression is applied > > I use LZO to backup my jpeg images, that are stored on SSDs. I used to

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-18 Thread compdoc
On 02/17/2017 10:18 AM, Norbert Gomes wrote: > I read that LZO would be faster, but when I enable it (compression="LZO" > in the FileSet Include Options), no compression is applied I use LZO to backup my jpeg images, that are stored on SSDs. I used to use gzip2 for speed, and in the hopes it wou

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-18 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello, Norbert, >> And also, have you got some ideas to speed up my backups using >> compression (GZIP1 or GZIP6 gives the same level of performance) ? No, they don't. Please find this performance analysis: http://bacula.us/bacula-compression-analysis/ >> Regards >> >> Norbert Regards, -- ==

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 02/17/2017 10:18 AM, Norbert Gomes wrote: > Hi list ! > > GZIP compression is quite slow on our Windows clients (5.2.10), it > increases a lot the duration of theses backups. The speed of the network > transfer is at: 20 MB/s with GZIP and 100 MB/s without compression > > I read that LZO would b

[Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-17 Thread Norbert Gomes
Hi list ! GZIP compression is quite slow on our Windows clients (5.2.10), it increases a lot the duration of theses backups. The speed of the network transfer is at: 20 MB/s with GZIP and 100 MB/s without compression I read that LZO would be faster, but when I enable it (compression="LZO" in the

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-23 Thread pietersnld
bacula-13 wrote > On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:52:27 + > Doug Sampson < > dougs@ > > wrote: > >> According to Laurent, all aspects of the Bacula system (director, >> storage, & client) must be enabled with LZO support. I haven't tested it >> without LZO support in the director and storage devices.

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-22 Thread Laurent Papier
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:52:27 + Doug Sampson wrote: > According to Laurent, all aspects of the Bacula system (director, storage, & > client) must be enabled with LZO support. I haven't tested it without LZO > support in the director and storage devices. If you do, please post your > finding

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-17 Thread Doug Sampson
> This will cause a problem presumably, if you do backups on an LZO client > (such as I'm > considering on my SPARC T2 hosts, weedy CPU cores) then if necessary you > can't restore these > backups to a GZIP only client. > > It essentially limits the restore clients to those who also have LZO >

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-16 Thread Gary Cowell
This will cause a problem presumably, if you do backups on an LZO client (such as I'm considering on my SPARC T2 hosts, weedy CPU cores) then if necessary you can't restore these backups to a GZIP only client. It essentially limits the restore clients to those who also have LZO installed, yes? Al

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-04 Thread Doug Sampson
> > Thanks for confirming this. I've recompiled both the server and client > on the Bacula server and the configure options confirms the LZO support > option is enabled. > > Nice, you should now have a director (bacula-dir)with lzo compression > options and storage (bacula-sd) with lzo stream supp

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-04 Thread Laurent Papier
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 17:17:05 + Doug Sampson wrote: > > Thanks for confirming this. I've recompiled both the server and client on the > Bacula server and the configure options confirms the LZO support option is > enabled. Nice, you should now have a director (bacula-dir)with lzo compression

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-04 Thread Doug Sampson
> yes you need to have LZO include and lib installed in your system AND you > need to compile bacula (client, storage and director) in order to get LZO > compression support. > > There is a major compression speed improvement in LZO 2.05 and up on > 64bits Intel system. Check that you have at leas

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-04 Thread bacula
Le Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:28:46 + Doug Sampson écrit: > Hello- > > I want to use LZO compression in two of my jobs instead of GZIP. These jobs > back up to hard drives on a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE machine. Bacula v5.2.12. > > I installed archivers/lzo2 and verified that /usr/local/lib/liblzo2.so

[Bacula-users] LZO compression on FreeBSD

2013-06-03 Thread Doug Sampson
Hello- I want to use LZO compression in two of my jobs instead of GZIP. These jobs back up to hard drives on a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE machine. Bacula v5.2.12. I installed archivers/lzo2 and verified that /usr/local/lib/liblzo2.so exists. This was after I had been using Bacula on this particular se

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO-Compression

2012-04-25 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:23:37 +0200 Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > > > I've been playing around with the new lzo compression feature on > > > centos / redhat 5 and I'm more or less blown away by its > > > performance / compression ratio tradeoff. I was wondering if an > > > lzo-enabled windows client is

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO-Compression

2012-04-25 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:19:02PM +0300, Panagiotis Christias wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I've been playing around with the new lzo compression feature on > > centos / redhat 5 and I'm more or less blown away by its performance / > > co

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO-Compression

2012-04-09 Thread Panagiotis Christias
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've been playing around with the new lzo compression feature on > centos / redhat 5 and I'm more or less blown away by its performance / > compression ratio tradeoff. I was wondering if an lzo-enabled windows > client is also

[Bacula-users] LZO-Compression

2012-03-21 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, I've been playing around with the new lzo compression feature on centos / redhat 5 and I'm more or less blown away by its performance / compression ratio tradeoff. I was wondering if an lzo-enabled windows client is also in the works, and if that's the case, if there's something I could