On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:52:27 +0000 Doug Sampson <do...@dawnsign.com> wrote:
> According to Laurent, all aspects of the Bacula system (director, storage, & > client) must be enabled with LZO support. I haven't tested it without LZO > support in the director and storage devices. If you do, please post your > findings. I confirm this point. The LZO lib is only needed on the client but both the director and the storage need to have LZO support. LZO compression is configured in the fileset definition. The fileset is handled by the director. The storage need to have LZO enable to recognize the stream type when reading tape. > Yes, I would imagine that the client would need to support LZO prior to > restoring. Yes, it would mean one additional step in the restoration process > but not an insurmountable one for me. > Sure, the client need to be able to uncompress the data stream sent by the storage. The portability section of LZO web site shows that LZO could run on a large number of OS. I guess on every OS when bacula can run. -- Laurent Papier ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
