Hello nomad,
Sorry for the late reply. Great you have figured out the issue with the
configuration!
Best,
Ana
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 7:17 PM Lee Damon wrote:
> Well that's what I get for reading the documentation. All the pointers
> about Offline on Unmount led me down the wrong path.
>
> Set
Well that's what I get for reading the documentation. All the pointers
about Offline on Unmount led me down the wrong path.
Setting 'offline = 1" and "offline_sleep=10" seems to have fixed it.
nomad
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourc
Does anyone else have any suggestions?
thanks,
nomad
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:15 AM Lee Damon wrote:
> Ana, Gary,
>
> The devices were not properly owned. Changing them did not correct the
> problem, sadly. (Given the previous hardware was working with the incorrect
> ownerships this isn't rea
Ana, Gary,
The devices were not properly owned. Changing them did not correct the
problem, sadly. (Given the previous hardware was working with the incorrect
ownerships this isn't really surprising to me, though I would have loved
the quick fix had it held.)
The ownership is now bacula:bacula.
A
Hello,
Sorry, I sent an incomplete email earlier :-)
It seems that all btape tests, except for the autochanger test, have passed
without using "Offline On Unmount = yes". So I would keep the default value
and not change it.
It would be nice to see the kernel logs when the autochanger test fails:
Hello,
So all btape tests except the autochanger test were successful using the
defaul
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 4:49 AM Gary R. Schmidt
wrote:
> On 20/01/2023 04:30, Lee Damon wrote:
> > We recently replaced a working LTO5 + Scalar i40 jukebox with an IBM
> > LTO8 tape + Scalar i3 jukebox. The c
On 20/01/2023 04:30, Lee Damon wrote:
We recently replaced a working LTO5 + Scalar i40 jukebox with an IBM
LTO8 tape + Scalar i3 jukebox. The controller and all software remained
the same. I am suspecting a configuration problem and would greatly
appreciate guidance.
When I tried to label the ne
We recently replaced a working LTO5 + Scalar i40 jukebox with an IBM
LTO8 tape + Scalar i3 jukebox. The controller and all software remained
the same. I am suspecting a configuration problem and would greatly
appreciate guidance.
When I tried to label the new tapes it loaded the first one fine, la
