Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-05-01 Thread John Drescher
On 5/1/07, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, I'm a complete newbie. In fact apart from the test (which worked > > great) Bacula has never written anything to any of my tapes. > > I'll look again for this purge and relabel. I sure hope it clicks soon, > > it seems really powerful but

Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-05-01 Thread John Steel
Simon Tomlinson wrote: > Hi > It looks like the volume already has a label so you can't label it > again. Are you recycling it? If this is the case then you have to > purge and use relabel. > The full instructions for recycling volumes are in the manual. > No, I'm a complete newbie. In fact

Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-05-01 Thread Simon Tomlinson
Hi It looks like the volume already has a label so you can't label it again. Are you recycling it? If this is the case then you have to purge and use relabel. The full instructions for recycling volumes are in the manual. Simon John Steel wrote: Erich Prinz wrote: I do know that in

Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-05-01 Thread John Steel
Erich Prinz wrote: > I do know that in bcosole, you must mount the drive and then issue > > label > > to label the media mounted in the volume. Very similar with disc > backups if you aren't automatically labeling the volumes. Your choice > what to name it. Bacula will then use the newly created

Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-04-30 Thread John Drescher
> > On Apr 29, 2007, at 4:28 AM, John Steel wrote: > >> 2. Why does the "bytes" column show 58.2M when I know the backup is > >> much > >> bigger? > > Maybe you've got compression enabled on your job or on the tape drive > (though I'm not sure whether Bacula is actually aware of the compressed > si

Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-04-30 Thread Erich Prinz
I do know that in bcosole, you must mount the drive and then issue label to label the media mounted in the volume. Very similar with disc backups if you aren't automatically labeling the volumes. Your choice what to name it. Bacula will then use the newly created volume for the backup job.

Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-04-30 Thread John Steel
Erich Prinz wrote: > I can only get you pointed in the direction you need to take -- > hopefully one with more tape savvy will chime in here. > > From my limited experience with tapes, there are a couple utilities > that need to be run to make sure bacula can talk to the drive. One > utility wil

Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-04-30 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Prinz wrote: > There are also the mtx-changer scripts and some modifications that > will alert you to tape changes (see notes in the source code for more > details.) No need for mtx-changer scripts just to be notified when a tape needs to be

Re: [Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-04-30 Thread Erich Prinz
I can only get you pointed in the direction you need to take -- hopefully one with more tape savvy will chime in here. From my limited experience with tapes, there are a couple utilities that need to be run to make sure bacula can talk to the drive. One utility will write to the tape checki

[Bacula-users] Job is waiting for an appendable volume

2007-04-29 Thread John Steel
I am still trying to do my first bacula backup to tape, its a 80G folder from 2006 disk based backups. I think I have the correct job set up, I understand its a manual full job (no schedule) and have run into 2 problems (as seen in the log below). 1. Why can't I use my tape? I don't care whats