Re: [Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-14 Thread Vladimir Doisan
I have some questions regarding the latest 1.39 and future 1.40 So far how does encryption influences the backup speed? How about the encryption and compression? Is it a lot slower then compression alone? Which encryption algorithm is used for encryption? (I assume everything that OpenSSL supports?

[Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Thank you for your responses to my previous email. Since there were no negative responses to my proposal, the "official" release schedule is as follows: We will probably make several more beta release of 1.39.x between now and 15 October, then on my return sometime between the 15th and

[Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Well so far there are not a lot of opinions in, but they are 100% for #1 -- i.e. make some more beta releases as appropriate and then the production release in November. The main reason I'm sending this is to say that if you respond to my original email on this subject, *please* change

Re: [Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-13 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, although I'm still using 1.38.5 and never tested 1.39.x I vote for #1. I know the situation when one makes major changes right before going on holiday. That's not a very pleasant feeling and it's hard to relax in this time. Ralf --

Re: [Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-13 Thread Jonas Björklund
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote: > I would appreciate your thoughts on this. I especially encourage those of you > who are already using 1.39.x to speak up. I vote for #1. And the reason is that our company ar soon about to choose backup software. And Im sick of Legato. :-) And also yo

[Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-13 Thread Your Name
Hi there, I'm new to the list and am currently beta testing the 3.39.22 beta released a few days ago. I think option 1 would be best. thanks to everyone that puts time and effort into this project. -- - Using Tomcat but

Re: [Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-13 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [snip] > 1. Make several more beta releases of 1.39.x before I leave on vacation (i.e. > between now and roughly 10 October) and hold the official production release > until mid-November after my return. > > 2. Release Bacula 1.39.x in the next

[Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, There don't seem to be any serious outstanding issues with 1.39.x and the documentation is "reasonably" complete. You may be aware that I have been planning to release Bacula version 1.39.x (with an appropriate version change) to production around now. This would allow approximately 4