Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-17 Thread Rowdy
Dan Langille wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Tom Allison wrote: > >> Found binaries. But no clue how to configure anything at all. I >> thing it was pixelchaos or something like that. Very easy to find. > > Where did you find these binaries? Although only up to 2.2.7 seems to be there:

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Landon Fuller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 16, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile) wrote: > * Pkgsrc was already out there, they could have Integrated (which > would > help the community as a whole). When we originally wrote MacPorts (6 years ago -- 2002), pkgsrc's Mac

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Andrea Conti
> # launchctl load /Library/LaunchDaemons/bacula-fd.plist Well, you have to write that first (man launchd.plist, or just take one from /System/Library/LaunchDaemons and tweak it to suit your needs). The problem with launchd is that it has too many expectations on what the called program should

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 16:02 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > What do you have for a startup entry? It means nothing to me. It's an XML file called a "plist". /Library/LaunchDaemons/bacula-fd.plist # launchctl load /Library/LaunchDaemons/bacula-fd.plist # launchctl list It shows up as "org.bacula.

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 16, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Andrea Conti wrote: > Hello, > >> Any experience with compiling it on Mac OS/X? > > I've been compiling the FD from source on OS/X since 1.38, and apart > from the recent mess with the 10.5 system headers I never encountered > any problems. > > Just untar, configure, m

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 15:51 -0500, Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile) wrote: > aspect of things a lot more as I stumble my way through my BBA. Apple BTW, Apple's Q3 financial statement from Nov2007 reports 22 billion USD in assets, including 9 billion in "cash", and 38 million in "Goodwill". ~BAS ("You

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 15:36 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > Wow, Brian, that's the second time in this thread you've said No disrespect to Apple intended. Although I will comment (to you) that a quick search of the archives would reveal this discussion repeating a thread from back in November.

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Andrea Conti
Hello, > Any experience with compiling it on Mac OS/X? I've been compiling the FD from source on OS/X since 1.38, and apart from the recent mess with the 10.5 system headers I never encountered any problems. Just untar, configure, make and sudo make install. The only nuisance is that the firs

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 16, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile) wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 15:23 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> My hesitance about combining installation packages (fink, >> ports...) >>> is more a matter of packages installing duplicated libraries to >>> meet dependencies. And th

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 15:23 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > > My hesitance about combining installation packages (fink, > ports...) > > is more a matter of packages installing duplicated libraries to > > meet dependencies. And then I get into trouble thinking I have > > version 2 when in fac

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 16, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Tom Allison wrote: > > > On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Tom Allison wrote: >> >>> >>> Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:1

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Tom Allison
On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Tom Allison wrote: > >> >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Dan Langille wrote: On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-15 a

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Tom Allison wrote: > > Dan Langille wrote: >> On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >>> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 20:51 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > I have a Macbook running Tiger... > >>

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Tom Allison
So is it safe to assume that ports does not have a bacula client for Mac OS/X? I am really not inclined to start adding multiple port managers on top of my Macbook. A recipe for disaster. I've already invested a lot with port. And I'll also assume there are no binaries available? Any exper

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-15 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 20:51 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >>> I have a Macbook running Tiger... >>> >> >> Don't screw around. Use pkgsrc[.org]. You'll like it. It will feel >> like

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-15 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 20:51 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> I have a Macbook running Tiger... >> > > Don't screw around. Use pkgsrc[.org]. You'll like it. It will feel > like Ports, with out all of the blood loss. My 2.2.8 patches are

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-15 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 20:51 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > I have a Macbook running Tiger... > Don't screw around. Use pkgsrc[.org]. You'll like it. It will feel like Ports, with out all of the blood loss. My 2.2.8 patches are up on my site or in pkgsrc-wip[.sf.net] ~BAS > How do I get a bac

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-15 Thread Michael Galloway
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:30:40PM -0500, Michael Galloway wrote: > > sudo port selfupdate > sudo port search bacula > sudo port install bacula > > then a bunch of stuff to get it to launch at boot. let me look that up ... > > -- michael > hah, it even says how to do it: sudo port install bac

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-15 Thread Michael Galloway
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:21:12PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > > > >ports seems to have 2.2.6, not sure what fink has. download it and > >build it i guess :-) > > > I have macports installed... where do I go from here? Total lack of > knowledge here... > > sudo port selfupdate sudo port

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-15 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 15, 2008, at 9:11 PM, Michael Galloway wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:51:39PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >> I have a Macbook running Tiger... >> >> How do I get a bacula-fd 2.2.8 on there? >> >> -- >> Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/ >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > hmmm ... >

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-15 Thread Michael Galloway
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:51:39PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > I have a Macbook running Tiger... > > How do I get a bacula-fd 2.2.8 on there? > > -- > Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > hmmm ... ports seems to have 2.2.6, not sure what fink has. download it and

[Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-15 Thread Dan Langille
I have a Macbook running Tiger... How do I get a bacula-fd 2.2.8 on there? -- Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) V