Would the regress scripts on trunk be sufficient? That runs daily.
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
On Jun 23, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 June 2009 00:19:08 Dan Langille wrote:
>> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been con
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 00:19:08 Dan Langille wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been converted into a
> > struct, which is not the case. Sorry for the false alarm.
>
> No worries. If you want me to try out stuff on either 6.x or 7.x, just
> shout.
It
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been converted into a struct,
> which is not the case. Sorry for the false alarm.
No worries. If you want me to try out stuff on either 6.x or 7.x, just
shout.
It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been converted into a struct,
which is not the case. Sorry for the false alarm.
Kern
On Sunday 21 June 2009 17:55:43 Dan Langille wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello Dan,
> >
> > This is to warn you that Bacula will probably not be able to be co
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> This is to warn you that Bacula will probably not be able to be compiled and
> run with encryption on Release 7 of FreeBSD. This is because the version of
> pthreads in that release has pthread_t defined as a structure, which is
> incompatible with OpenSSL.
Hello Dan,
This is to warn you that Bacula will probably not be able to be compiled and
run with encryption on Release 7 of FreeBSD. This is because the version of
pthreads in that release has pthread_t defined as a structure, which is
incompatible with OpenSSL. The OpenSSL API mandates doing
