On Tuesday 23 June 2009 00:19:08 Dan Langille wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been converted into a > > struct, which is not the case. Sorry for the false alarm. > > No worries. If you want me to try out stuff on either 6.x or 7.x, just > shout.
It would be very useful for you to compile Bacula 3.0.1 on 7.x with full encryption enabled. That would assure me there is no problem. My original concern stems from a recent piece of debug code that was not truely portable -- I removed that code but worry about some other similar problem concerning pthreads. Regards, Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
