On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> A long running problem with the Bacula port is being worked on by Alonso
> Cárdenas Márquez. I have been testing out his changes recently.
>
> The problem: shared libraries installed by one of the ports are
> reinstalled by the other ports. Th
On 04/03/12 20:55, Dan Langille wrote:
> Better solution: create a third port which installs JUST the shared
> libraries. That solution isn't in scope at present.
I agree this would be the best solution.
However bacula-server depending on bacula-client is fine for me; IMHO
the disadvantages wil
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On 03.04.2012 21:55, Dan Langille wrote:
>> A long running problem with the Bacula port is being worked on by Alonso
>> Cárdenas Márquez. I have been testing out his changes recently.
>>
>> The problem: shared libraries installed by one of th
Dan Langille wrote:
> Comments? Questions? Volunteers for testing? Volunteers for
> improvements to the solution?
Ho do other packaging solutions solve this problem? Or do they
install always the server and the client part together?
--
On 03.04.2012 21:55, Dan Langille wrote:
> A long running problem with the Bacula port is being worked on by Alonso
> Cárdenas Márquez. I have been testing out his changes recently.
>
> The problem: shared libraries installed by one of the ports are
> reinstalled by the other ports. This problem h
A long running problem with the Bacula port is being worked on by Alonso
Cárdenas Márquez. I have been testing out his changes recently.
The problem: shared libraries installed by one of the ports are
reinstalled by the other ports. This problem has raised its head in a few
recent posts.
The pro
