On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote: > A long running problem with the Bacula port is being worked on by Alonso > Cárdenas Márquez. I have been testing out his changes recently. > > The problem: shared libraries installed by one of the ports are > reinstalled by the other ports. This problem has raised its head in a few > recent posts. > > The proposed solution at present involves making bacula-client a dependent > of bacula-server. Let bacula-client install the shared libraries. > > Downside: you can't install bacula-server without first installing > bacula-client. > > Benefit: it solves the problem. > > Better solution: create a third port which installs JUST the shared > libraries. That solution isn't in scope at present. > > Comments? Questions? Volunteers for testing? Volunteers for > improvements to the solution?
MySQL client and server ports use the same methodology (server port depends to client port). Go ahead and commit the change. It solves in a clean way a really ugly problem that should be there and the disadvantages are negligible. Regards, Panagiotis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
