On Mar 2, 2015, at 6:39 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
>
> On 14/02/15 23:26, Dan Langille wrote:
>> This post came to my attention recently:
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2015-February/006581.html
>>
>> In short: "The primary focus of these changes is to modernize FreeBSD's
>> ta
This post came to my attention recently:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2015-February/006581.html
In short: "The primary focus of these changes is to modernize FreeBSD's
tape infrastructure so that we can take advantage of some of the
features of modern tape drives and allow su
Op 2013-07-19 om 21:33 schreef Kern Sibbald:
> On 07/19/2013 02:33 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
Synopsis: sysutils/bacula-server - Feature Request - Change sysconfdir to
$PREFIX/etc/bacu
On 07/19/2013 09:35 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> You really should be putting everything into /opt/bacula. It is
>> *much* more backup friendly for disaster recovery situations.
> Individual sysadmins can do that. But it goes against expected loca
On Jul 19, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> You really should be putting everything into /opt/bacula. It is
> *much* more backup friendly for disaster recovery situations.
Individual sysadmins can do that. But it goes against expected locations in
FreeBSD (indeed, several other OS):
h
You really should be putting everything into /opt/bacula. It is
*much* more backup friendly for disaster recovery situations.
Best regards,
Kern
On 07/19/2013 02:33 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 2013-01-08 14:26, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
On 2013-01-08 14:26, Dan Langille wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
>
> That is: all the Bacula stuff which normally fits in /usr/local/etc/
> into /usr/local/etc/bacula
>
> On the first upgrade to this c
On Jan 8, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
>
> That is: all the Bacula stuff which normally fits in /usr/local/etc/ into
> /usr/local/etc/bacula
>
> On the first upgrad
On 01/10/13 01:40, Dan Langille wrote:
> Oh, it does that. I did not know.
I though I had already reported this, but I might be misremembering... :)
> Question:
>
> What will happen upon start up if that file does not exist?
Nothing strange.
Everything works fine until you issue the "query"
On 10/01/13 00:40, Dan Langille wrote:
> Oh, it does that. I did not know. Question: What will happen upon
> start up if that file does not exist?
Nothing.
It's only called when you run the "query" command and if query.sql is
missing it just complains about it.
--
On Jan 9, 2013, at 5:51 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 01/08/13 21:07, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
>> On 01/08/13 20:26, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> Folks,
>
> Just a simple addition, since we are there...
>
> I really hate it when upgrading port overwrites
> "/usr/local/share/bacula/query.sql" with
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:51:18 +0100, Andrea Venturoli said:
>
> On 01/08/13 21:07, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> > On 01/08/13 20:26, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> Folks,
>
> Just a simple addition, since we are there...
>
> I really hate it when upgrading port overwrites
> "/usr/local/share/bacula
On 01/08/13 21:07, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 01/08/13 20:26, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Folks,
Just a simple addition, since we are there...
I really hate it when upgrading port overwrites
"/usr/local/share/bacula/query.sql" with a dummy file.
Could we have sample-query.sql as in source and leave
> We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
>
> That is: all the Bacula stuff which normally fits in /usr/local/etc/
> into /usr/local/etc/bacula
>
> On the first upgrade to this changed port, your stuff would break. :)
> You'd need t
On 01/08/13 20:26, Dan Langille wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
>
> That is: all the Bacula stuff which normally fits in /usr/local/etc/
> into /usr/local/etc/bacula
This Looks like a good change to me. I
On 01/08/13 20:26, Dan Langille wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
>
> That is: all the Bacula stuff which normally fits in /usr/local/etc/
> into /usr/local/etc/bacula
>
> On the first upgrade to this change
On 08.01.2013 21:26, Dan Langille wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
>
> That is: all the Bacula stuff which normally fits in /usr/local/etc/
> into /usr/local/etc/bacula
>
> On the first upgrade to this chan
Folks,
We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
That is: all the Bacula stuff which normally fits in /usr/local/etc/
into /usr/local/etc/bacula
On the first upgrade to this changed port, your stuff would break. :)
You'd need to
18 matches
Mail list logo
