On Mar 2, 2015, at 6:39 AM, Alan Brown <a.br...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 14/02/15 23:26, Dan Langille wrote: >> This post came to my attention recently: >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2015-February/006581.html >> >> In short: "The primary focus of these changes is to modernize FreeBSD's >> tape infrastructure so that we can take advantage of some of the >> features of modern tape drives and allow support for LTFS." >> >> I don't know enough about these device to gauge the affects on the project. > > As far as I can tell ltfs support on linux sits on top of the standard mt-st > stuff as a userspace (fuse) filesystem > > I'd hope it's much the same with BSD. Removing the standard interface would > be counterproductive overall
I don't know the details. The code has been committed to FreeBSD HEAD. I installed that on my test system here. I have run some tar tests and the code passes the basic btape test. Next step is Bacula jobs. Does this confirm that the standard interface remains? — Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
