Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-26 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Ryan Novosielski wrote: >> P.S. My guess is yes, the Volume parameter does get updated. I >> conclude that because of the relabelling, which creates a new Volume. >> There will be a new entry in the Volume table. New label == new >> volume. I still recommend testing to

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-25 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Langille wrote: > On 25 Sep 2006 at 17:49, Alan Brown wrote: > >> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> If you added that directive to the Pool after the Volume was created, >>> you'll need to update the Volume parameters from the Pool d

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-25 Thread Michael Nelson
On Mon, September 25, 2006 8:57 am, Dan Langille said: > If you added that directive to the Pool after the Volume was created, > you'll need to update the Volume parameters from the Pool definition. > This can be done from bcsonole with the update command. > > Tell us what happens. Thank you! T

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-25 Thread Dan Langille
On 25 Sep 2006 at 17:49, Alan Brown wrote: > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote: > > > If you added that directive to the Pool after the Volume was created, > > you'll need to update the Volume parameters from the Pool definition. > > This can be done from bcsonole with the update command. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-25 Thread Dan Langille
On 25 Sep 2006 at 17:49, Alan Brown wrote: > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote: > > > If you added that directive to the Pool after the Volume was created, > > you'll need to update the Volume parameters from the Pool definition. > > This can be done from bcsonole with the update command. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-25 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote: > If you added that directive to the Pool after the Volume was created, > you'll need to update the Volume parameters from the Pool definition. > This can be done from bcsonole with the update command. Just to clarify Does this parameter get updated f

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-25 Thread Dan Langille
On 25 Sep 2006 at 8:09, Michael Nelson wrote: > On Wed, September 20, 2006 11:05 pm, Troy Daniels said: > > > Something like 'Volume Use Duration = 24h' should work if added to your > > Pools definition. > > I tried it, and it just keeps backing up to the same tape day after day, > and it's stil

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-25 Thread Michael Nelson
On Wed, September 20, 2006 11:05 pm, Troy Daniels said: > Something like 'Volume Use Duration = 24h' should work if added to your > Pools definition. I tried it, and it just keeps backing up to the same tape day after day, and it's still marked as "append". I guess I will have to go that other r

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-21 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 9/21/2006 2:24 AM, Michael Nelson wrote: > I have a Quantum Superloader3 LTO-3 jukebox with one magazine (eight > slots) and one drive. I have been backing our servers up to it > successfully, after much tweaking. > > My problem is that I don't really want it to continue backing up to one

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-21 Thread Janco van der Merwe
] On Behalf Of Troy Daniels Sent: 21 September, 2006 08:05 To: Michael Nelson Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger Michael Nelson wrote: > I have a Quantum Superloader3 LTO-3 jukebox with one magazine (eight > slots) and one

Re: [Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-20 Thread Troy Daniels
Michael Nelson wrote: > I have a Quantum Superloader3 LTO-3 jukebox with one magazine (eight > slots) and one drive. I have been backing our servers up to it > successfully, after much tweaking. > > My problem is that I don't really want it to continue backing up to one > tape until it's full. I

[Bacula-users] Forcing use of next tape in Autochanger

2006-09-20 Thread Michael Nelson
I have a Quantum Superloader3 LTO-3 jukebox with one magazine (eight slots) and one drive. I have been backing our servers up to it successfully, after much tweaking. My problem is that I don't really want it to continue backing up to one tape until it's full. I am backing up about 100GB / night