David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 11, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 22:33, David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 15:33, Attila Fülöp wrote:
David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 10
On Monday 14 November 2005 20:58, David Duchscher wrote:
...
>
> Here is the patch to fix ACLs on Solaris systems. I have tested the
> code on a Solaris 2.6 system and have tested template of the code on
> these systems and filesystems:
>
>SunOS 5.6 Generic_105181-16UFS
>SunOS 5.8
On Nov 11, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 22:33, David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 15:33, Attila Fülöp wrote:
David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibb
On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Referring to the thread "[Bacula-users] ACL's with Bacula on FreeBSD
(resend)" started by Tony Lambregts on 20.07.2005 20:15 I need some
clarifications.
Is the patch mentioned in this threa
On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 15:33, Attila Fülöp wrote:
David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Is the patch mentioned in this thr
On Friday 11 November 2005 22:27, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> Attila Fülöp
Your patch is now integrated. It will go into the CVS shortly. Thanks :-)
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development
David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 15:33, Attila Fülöp wrote:
David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Is the
On Friday 11 November 2005 22:33, David Duchscher wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> > Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >> On Friday 11 November 2005 15:33, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> >>> David Duchscher wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Thursday 10
Attila Fülöp wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Ok, than I will try to patch configure.in to detect ACL support on
solaris.
That would be very kind of you ... :-)
All right, I'll do. That said, it may take some time since I've no sun
at home and are not that familiar with autoconf.
Ok, it
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 15:33, Attila Fülöp wrote:
David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Is the patch mentioned in this thread integrated into 1.38, that is
do ACLs work wit
On Friday 11 November 2005 15:33, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> David Duchscher wrote:
> > On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >> On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
>
>
>
> >>> Is the patch mentioned in this thread integrated into 1.38, that is
> >>> do ACLs work with F
David Duchscher wrote:
On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Is the patch mentioned in this thread integrated into 1.38, that is
do ACLs work with FreeBSD? And second, even more important to me,
do ACLs work with Solaris clie
Deim Ágoston wrote:
Skimming over sys/acl.h on
Solaris 2.9 it seems this is quite a different API.
Yes, so are some of the others ...
I'm forced to use ACLs soon, and need a way to back them up. So I
would try to patch in support for Solaris ACLs if it's needed.
To the best of my knowledge
On Friday 11 November 2005 14:09, David Duchscher wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> >> Referring to the thread "[Bacula-users] ACL's with Bacula on FreeBSD
> >> (resend)" started by Tony Lambregts on 20.07.2005 20
On Friday 11 November 2005 14:09, David Duchscher wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> >> Referring to the thread "[Bacula-users] ACL's with Bacula on FreeBSD
> >> (resend)" started by Tony Lambregts on 20.07.2005 20
>> Skimming over sys/acl.h on
>> Solaris 2.9 it seems this is quite a different API.
> Yes, so are some of the others ...
>>
>> I'm forced to use ACLs soon, and need a way to back them up. So I
>> would try to patch in support for Solaris ACLs if it's needed.
>
> To the best of my knowledge with th
On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> Referring to the thread "[Bacula-users] ACL's with Bacula on FreeBSD
> (resend)" started by Tony Lambregts on 20.07.2005 20:15 I need some
> clarifications.
>
> Is the patch mentioned in this thread integrated into 1.38, that is
> do ACLs wo
Referring to the thread "[Bacula-users] ACL's with Bacula on FreeBSD
(resend)" started by Tony Lambregts on 20.07.2005 20:15 I need some
clarifications.
Is the patch mentioned in this thread integrated into 1.38, that is
do ACLs work with FreeBSD? And second, even more important to me,
do ACLs wo
18 matches
Mail list logo
