On Friday 11 November 2005 22:33, David Duchscher wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> > Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >> On Friday 11 November 2005 15:33, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> >>> David Duchscher wrote:
> >>>> On Nov 10, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>>>> On Thursday 10 November 2005 21:22, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> >>>
> >>> <snip/>
> >>>
> >>>>>> Is the patch mentioned in this thread integrated into 1.38,
> >>>>>> that is
> >>>>>> do ACLs work with FreeBSD? And second, even more important to me,
> >>>>>> do ACLs work with Solaris clients?
> >>>
> >>> <snip/>
> >>>
> >>>> I can confirm that Solaris doesn't work. Their is code for Solaris
> >>>> ACLs but the configure script does not detect ACL support on
> >>>> Solaris.
> >>>> I helped with Darwin and FreeBSD but I have not had time to
> >>>> really look
> >>>> at Solaris fully until yesterday. Seems disaster recovery is
> >>>> now top
> >>>> priority for the next few weeks. Ah, the life of changing
> >>>> priorities.
> >>>
> >>> Ok, than I will try to patch configure.in to detect ACL support
> >>> on solaris.
> >>
> >> That would be very kind of you ... :-)
> >
> > All right, I'll do. That said, it may take some time since I've no sun
> > at home and are not that familiar with autoconf.
>
> autoconf is easy to fix. I have detection working now. There is
> also an issue with a ifdef in src/filed/acl.c that now that I look at
> the code again, limits 1.38.0 to FreeBSD, Darwin, and Linux. I had
> just added FreeBSD and Darwin to the ifdef when I made my changes. I
> was trying not to change too many things and I had only tested those
> platforms. I am thinking that we should remove the ifdef or at least
> enable the POSIX platforms. Thoughts?
I probably won't have any problems moving a #ifdef, but I'll need to see it. I
consider such changes low impact if it just adds code for another platform.
>
> As for Solaris, I have things mostly working on Solaris. There is at
> least one bug in the code currently in 1.38.0 and I am seeing another
> strangeness when ACLs are restored. I also have to figure out the
> best way to bypass smartalloc to free the system call memory since I
> am very new to smartalloc. The good news is that we have lots of
> Sun's around here that the admins have graciously given me access so
> I can test things. Hopefully I will have things working by the end
> of the weekend.
Try: actuallyfree(void *);
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
