please have a look at the readme file at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
there's this note:
** The included /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-%{version}/README.Fedora contains
quick installation instructions and notes **
You'll find your quick answer by reading it.
Hello,
please have a look at the readme file at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
there's this note:
** The included /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-%{version}/README.Fedora contains
quick installation instructions and notes **
You'll find your quick answer by readin
Hi all,
Simone, are the RHEL 6 packages compiled with mysql support? Whenever I try to
start the director, i get this message in the log file:
22-Jan 17:43 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: postgresql.c:241 Unable to
connect to PostgreSQL server. Database=bacula User=bacula
Possible causes: SQL
It is now working for RHEL 5; it was a problem of the different default
algorithm used by yum:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/365300.html
Please type the following as root and try again:
rm -fr /var/cache/yum/epel-bacula/
Thanks,
--Simone
On 2 January 2012 13:14,
I'm installing a RHEL 4 and 5 vm right now for spotting problems.
Thanks,
--Simone
On 2 January 2012 12:47, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
> Hello Simone, just to give you a feedback: I've tried again on a i386
> CentOS 5.7 box and the problem persists:
>
> *[root@ptiap yum.repos.d]# yum --enabler
Hello Simone, just to give you a feedback: I've tried again on a i386
CentOS 5.7 box and the problem persists:
*[root@ptiap yum.repos.d]# yum --enablerepo epel update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
* epel: mirror.symnds.com
base | 1.
Hello,
I've checked the checksums on the files and everything seems correct.
The weird thing is the second message you get, "Error: file is
encrypted or is not a database"; I''ve never seen that message.
The next thing is that appears after "updates/primary_db"; so it
doesn't seem related to the
Simone, I'm trying to use your repository on a CentOS 5.7 adm64 machine,
and "yum update" returns the following:
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
addons
| 951 B 00:00
addons/primary
| 204 B 00:00
base
| 1.1 kB 00:00
base/primary
| 1.2 MB 00:00
base
3566
Ah, thanks, I'd missed that you had updated the RPMs on fedorapeople.org.
__Martin
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:16:29 +0100, Simone Caronni said:
>
> Hello,
>
> fedora-usermgmt adds 33 + the "baseuid" defined in his config files, the
> latest RPM without it uses 133 as a static uid.
>
> Regar
Hello,
fedora-usermgmt adds 33 + the "baseuid" defined in his config files, the
latest RPM without it uses 133 as a static uid.
Regards,
--Simone
On Dec 20, 2011 8:53 PM, "Martin Simmons" wrote:
> I'm probably confused, but why is the rpm adding user/group 33, rather than
> 133?
>
> __Martin
>
I'm probably confused, but why is the rpm adding user/group 33, rather than
133?
__Martin
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:56:15 +0100, Simone Caronni said:
>
> Sorry, those are the basis for fedora-usermgmt generation, the static
> uids associated with services can be found inside the "setup" pac
Sorry, those are the basis for fedora-usermgmt generation, the static
uids associated with services can be found inside the "setup" package
on any system.
i.e. on my Fedora system:
[slaanesh@3zpc0560 ~]$ rpm -qd setup
/usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/setup-2.8.36/uidgid
[slaanes
Hello,
what do you mean "it is a pratical joke or a time bomb"?
In the links I've pasted there's also the Fedora "user registry" for
uids/gids, it is at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry
Remember this is a Fedora package and not a package for everyone, so
it follows those guide
Op 20111215 om 16:40 schreef Joseph L. Casale:
> >It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora
> >packaging guidelines:
>
> Right:) Not EL requirements.
>
> >I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel
> >commands, but I need to assess the change with the other
>It is not a requirement but a recommendation inside the Fedora
>packaging guidelines:
Right:) Not EL requirements.
>I could try to remove that and put standard useradd / userdel
>commands, but I need to assess the change with the other Bacula
>mantainers and good reasons to do so.
>Is there any
Hello,
I've updated the package on top of what is currently in Fedora.
In there we have this post scriptlet:
%pre common
/usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 33 -r bacula &>/dev/null || :
/usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 33 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/bacula -M \
-c 'Bacula Backup System' -g bacula
> I'm happy to address all the package issues people might encounter and
> I'm available to ideas or constructive criticism regarding choices or
> features missing.
> When I will get enough feedback that the approach used inside the
> package is right I will try to see if some patches could be i
Fixed, sorry.
You can anyway pass --disablegpg to yum to avoid the key checking.
Regards,
--Simone
On 14 December 2011 16:27, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 06/12/11 17:06, Simone Caronni wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm hosting the repository at:
>>
>> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/
>
>
>
On 06/12/11 17:06, Simone Caronni wrote:
>
> I'm hosting the repository at:
>
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/
I have no permission to
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/RPM-GPG-KEY-slaanesh so I
can't install the packages.
Could you please correct it.
-
On 14.12.2011 11:50, Simone Caronni wrote:
>> I'm trying to use epel-5 repository on Centos 5.2, but I get this error:
>> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/2472fc8e3db92dc60426193ee172a9e6c7c0d6619f980d1ed5f16d79cc10b48a-primary.sqlite.gz:
>> [Errno -3] Error
> I'm trying to use epel-5 repository on Centos 5.2, but I get this error:
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-5/i386/repodata/2472fc8e3db92dc60426193ee172a9e6c7c0d6619f980d1ed5f16d79cc10b48a-primary.sqlite.gz:
> [Errno -3] Error performing checksum
>
> I am not an über yum m
On 06.12.2011 18:06, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some
> years and went through many iterations with the Bacula developer
> themselves to fix and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we
> moved away from the Community Ver
You're welcome!
I'm updating right now RHEL 6 packages and I've added RHEL 4 packages.
Let me know if you have any issue.
Regards,
--Simone
On 7 December 2011 14:48, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
> This is AWESOME, thank you very much!
>
> 2011/12/6 Simone Caronni
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> the compa
Hello,
the company I was working for has been a Bacula customer for some years and
went through many iterations with the Bacula developer themselves to fix
and change the Enterprise Edition behaviour when we moved away from the
Community Version. Their support was awesome.
Now I've changed job an
24 matches
Mail list logo
