In the message dated: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:15:43 +0200,
The pithy ruminations from Felix Schwarz on
were:
=> Mark,
=>
=> Mark Nienberg wrote:
=> > Sourceforge shows that your version 2.0.3 for fedora 5 had:
=> >
=> > 312 downloads for the client,
=> > 221 downloads for mysql,
=> > 130 downloads
Mark,
Mark Nienberg wrote:
> Sourceforge shows that your version 2.0.3 for fedora 5 had:
>
> 312 downloads for the client,
> 221 downloads for mysql,
> 130 downloads for postgre, and
> 140 downloads for sqlite
> for a total of 803 (combining i386 and x86_64).
But these RPMs were built in April 20
Felix Schwarz wrote:
> No Fedora 5:
> I did not build RPMs for Fedora 5 because the Fedora Project eol'd this
> version
> of Fedora at the end of June [1]. If you are still using Fedora 5 (or even
> older
> versions) IMHO you should switch either to new versions of Fedora or use
> CentOS
> i
Hi,
as you might have noticed, I published RPMs for Bacula 2.2.4 on Fedora {6,7}
and
CentOS {4,5} on i386 and x86_64.
Attention: Do not use the RPMs packages if you installed Bacula from the
official Fedora repositories or Fedora EPEL! You will need to uninstall these
RPMs before installing t
