Hi,
On 12/4/2006 2:07 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
...
> Following up to this, after a weekend of continus drive activity, the
> system has now wedged totally after recycling 2 Pool tapes that weren't in
> the changer and any attempts to talk to bacula-sd in order to scan the
> slots after they were i
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Alan Brown wrote:
>> It appears to me that you have run into some sort of race condition where two
>> threads want to use the same Volume and they were both given access.
>> Normally that is no problem. However, one thread wanted the particular
>> Volume in drive 0, but it wa
On Friday 01 December 2006 18:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In the message dated: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:31:55 GMT,
> The pithy ruminations from Alan Brown on
>
we
> re:
> => On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> =>
> => > It appears to me that you have run into some sort of race condition
On Friday 01 December 2006 18:31, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > It appears to me that you have run into some sort of race condition where
two
> > threads want to use the same Volume and they were both given access.
> > Normally that is no problem. However, one
In the message dated: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:31:55 GMT,
The pithy ruminations from Alan Brown on
we
re:
=> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
=>
=> > It appears to me that you have run into some sort of race condition where
two
=> > threads want to use the same Volume and they were both giv
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> It appears to me that you have run into some sort of race condition where two
> threads want to use the same Volume and they were both given access.
> Normally that is no problem. However, one thread wanted the particular
> Volume in drive 0, but it was
On Friday 01 December 2006 15:41, Ian Levesque wrote:
> Has anybody run into this problem? This is the first time I've seen
> this, and I've been running Bacula for almost a year. It looks like
> two jobs simultaneously wanted the same tape -- I seem to recall the
> need to use some sort of l
Has anybody run into this problem? This is the first time I've seen
this, and I've been running Bacula for almost a year. It looks like
two jobs simultaneously wanted the same tape -- I seem to recall the
need to use some sort of lock in the mtx script prior to 1.38, but
I'm running 1.39.28
