On 23 Jan 2006 at 8:45, Ralf Gross wrote:
> I think I'll let bacula-sd run as bacula:tape, thus I can leave the
> debian default permissions as they are.
FYI, that is what FreeBSD does:
bacula-fd -u root -g wheel
bacula-sd -u bacula -g operator
bacula-dir -u bacula -g bacula
$ ls -l /dev/sa0
cr
Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:31:01 +0100, Ralf Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> [access on /dev/sg3 as user/group bacula:bacula|tape]
>
> A process has a set of groups, which can be a different set from those
> associated with a user. The "su" command (or however you b
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:31:01 +0100, Ralf Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Russell Howe schrieb:
> > James P. Kinney III wrote:
> > > bacula is a member of the disk group.
> >
> > Isn't being a member of the disk group effectively the same as being
> > root, since you can gain access to the
Russell Howe schrieb:
> James P. Kinney III wrote:
> > bacula is a member of the disk group.
>
> Isn't being a member of the disk group effectively the same as being
> root, since you can gain access to the block devices containing the
> local filesystems?
I discovered a similar problem today wit
James P. Kinney III wrote:
> bacula is a member of the disk group.
Isn't being a member of the disk group effectively the same as being
root, since you can gain access to the block devices containing the
local filesystems?
--
Russell Howe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 10:25 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I think you can do things much more simply by using groups and possibly
> tweaking udev, then you won't need to change things back and forth.
> Personally, I took a big hammer to my udev for both the tape drive and the
> control channel.
On Sunday 15 January 2006 04:31, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 18:07 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 14 Jan 2006 at 18:00, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 19:20 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:14, James P. Kinney III wr
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 18:07 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2006 at 18:00, James P. Kinney III wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 19:20 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:14, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 15:31 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrot
On 14 Jan 2006 at 18:00, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 19:20 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:14, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 15:31 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > > > So it looks like the mtx-changer is not being touche
