Re: [Bacula-users] Copy to tape

2012-07-05 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
Il giorno gio, 05/07/2012 alle 13.58 +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp ha scritto: > If the copy job finishes successfully, I'd simply ignore the "starting > full backup" job message > ;-) Ok, but this is not an answer :) I would like to know why bacula is telling me that a new full backup is being made in c

Re: [Bacula-users] Copy to tape

2012-07-05 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:14:36PM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > > The full client backup is not run, as far as I can see. > A full backup will take many many hours and actually the copy jobs > ends in a couple of minutes. If the copy job finishes successfully, I'd simply ignore the "star

Re: [Bacula-users] Copy to tape

2012-07-03 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
Il giorno mar, 03/07/2012 alle 15.30 +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp ha scritto: > can you post your copy job definition? Job { Name = "myclient-TapeCopyFull" Type = Copy Pool = myclient-FullPool #Level = Full Client = myclient-fd Fileset = None Priority = 11 SpoolData = No Selection Type

Re: [Bacula-users] Copy to tape

2012-07-03 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:06:48PM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > I'm still having issue with a copy job. > I'm trying to copy a job using this selection query: > Hello Gandalf, can you post your copy job definition? Have you checked if a full *client* backup is started after that message

[Bacula-users] Copy to tape

2012-07-03 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
I'm still having issue with a copy job. I'm trying to copy a job using this selection query: SELECT * FROM Job WHERE (EndTime BETWEEN NOW() - INTERVAL 40 DAY AND NOW()) AND Type = 'B' AND Level = 'F' AND (JobStatus = 'e' OR JobStatus = 'T') AND Name = 'myclient-job' GROUP BY Name; This query seem

[Bacula-users] Copy to Tape - wrong level

2011-02-17 Thread Dan Langille
I'm getting far too tired to follow this one... :) I noticed that a Copy to Tape job was putting my incremental backups into a full pool. That is, the original job was level = incremental. The copy to tape was run at level = full. I wasn't sure why, but I think I've found it. This is the orig