On 2014-11-19 12:46, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Brady, Mike
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-11-19 08:52, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
> Do you have "prefer mounted volumes" set to no in your jobs
> definition? It is recommended if you are using multi
Hi Mike,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Brady, Mike
wrote:
> On 2014-11-19 08:52, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
> >>> Do you have "prefer mounted volumes" set to no in your jobs
> >>> definition? It is recommended if you are using multiple devices
> >>> and
> >>> one pool.
> >>
> >> I do not hav
On 2014-11-19 08:52, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
>>> Do you have "prefer mounted volumes" set to no in your jobs
>>> definition? It is recommended if you are using multiple devices
>>> and
>>> one pool.
>>
>> I do not have this set because of the warnings against it in both
>> the manual and one o
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Brady, Mike
wrote:
> On 2014-11-16 05:36, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Despite that the white paper tell us about having "Maximum Concurrent
>> Jobs = 1" in device configuration. I think this could make sense when
>> using stand alone devices in
On 2014-11-16 05:36, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Despite that the white paper tell us about having "Maximum Concurrent
> Jobs = 1" in device configuration. I think this could make sense when
> using stand alone devices in a group as you have in the white papers.
> When using autocha
On 2014-11-16 02:12, Josh Fisher wrote:
> On 11/14/2014 6:17 PM, Brady, Mike wrote:
>> First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best
>> Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents
>> available.
>>
>> I have been playing around with the best way for doing
Hi Mike,
Despite that the white paper tell us about having "Maximum Concurrent Jobs
= 1" in device configuration. I think this could make sense when using
stand alone devices in a group as you have in the white papers. When using
autochangers, it is much better you use the "Maximum Concurrent Jobs
On 11/14/2014 6:17 PM, Brady, Mike wrote:
> First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best
> Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents
> available.
>
> I have been playing around with the best way for doing concurrent
> backups for a while and these docu
On 2014-11-15 20:45, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Unfortunately, I no longer have the time to help people debug usage
> problems, which I actually enjoy doing, but the other users on this
> Bacula email list should be able to help you resolve this. I do have a
> few remarks:
>
Thanks for taking the time
Unfortunately, I no longer have the time to help people debug usage
problems, which I actually enjoy doing, but the other users on this
Bacula email list should be able to help you resolve this. I do have a
few remarks:
1. There is no reason to set the VolumePoolInterval to anything other
than th
On 2014-11-15 12:17, Brady, Mike wrote:
> First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best
> Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents
> available.
>
> I have been playing around with the best way for doing concurrent
> backups for a while and these docum
First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best
Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents
available.
I have been playing around with the best way for doing concurrent
backups for a while and these documents have helped my understanding
considerably.
Quoting Mike Brady :
> I asked this question a couple of months ago and didn't get a
> response, but have seen a few sort of similar questions lately and
> thought that I would ask again before trying this in production.
>
> I have a disk based pool and want to run concurrent backups to this
> poo
I asked this question a couple of months ago and didn't get a
response, but have seen a few sort of similar questions lately and
thought that I would ask again before trying this in production.
I have a disk based pool and want to run concurrent backups to this
pool. I am currently running b
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I'm re-instating my bacula system after an althernative system failed.
> Unfortunately the config files I have are not the right version and I can't
> get concurrent backups working again.
>
> I have 30+ workstations and 10+ se
Hi folks.
I'm re-instating my bacula system after an althernative system failed.
Unfortunately the config files I have are not the right version and I can't
get concurrent backups working again.
I have 30+ workstations and 10+ servers all backing up to 3 storage devices. I
used to be abel to h
Andreas,
This really depends on your configuration. If you have only one drive
head, you should set
"Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 6" (or any number your want)
in your job definitions. If you have multiple drive i/o heads, you have
to also configure your job definition to prefer mounted volumes to
Attila Fülöp wrote:
> Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>> hi!
>>
>> reading the documentation i understand that you should have several
>> volumes for concurrent backups, on different devices/directories. (i
>> work on disk for now.)
>>
>> However some people here on the list seem to be doing well with
>> c
On 25.06.2009 14:10, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Thursday 25 June 2009 13:42:30 Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>> hi!
>>
>> reading the documentation i understand that you should have several
>> volumes for concurrent backups, on different devices/directories. (i
>> work on disk for now.)
>>
>> However s
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:34 AM, terryc wrote:
> Silver Salonen wrote:
>
>> As one device supports only one job, you have to create separate devices for
>> each job you want to be able to run concurrently.
>
> That isn't how I understand it. I am working on having multiple clients
> feeding files i
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> hi!
>
> reading the documentation i understand that you should have several
> volumes for concurrent backups, on different devices/directories. (i
> work on disk for now.)
>
> However some people here on the list seem to be doing well with
> concurrent backups to only on
Silver Salonen wrote:
> As one device supports only one job, you have to create separate devices for
> each job you want to be able to run concurrently.
That isn't how I understand it. I am working on having multiple clients
feeding files into a single tape drive at the same time and expect tha
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:42:30PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> hi!
>
> reading the documentation i understand that you should have several
> volumes for concurrent backups, on different devices/directories. (i
> work on disk for now.)
>
> However some people here on the list seem to be doing
On Thursday 25 June 2009 13:42:30 Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> hi!
>
> reading the documentation i understand that you should have several
> volumes for concurrent backups, on different devices/directories. (i
> work on disk for now.)
>
> However some people here on the list seem to be doing well wi
hi!
reading the documentation i understand that you should have several
volumes for concurrent backups, on different devices/directories. (i
work on disk for now.)
However some people here on the list seem to be doing well with
concurrent backups to only one volume. is that actually true or am i
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:15:18PM +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> the recent talk here of a bug relating to concurrent writes to a
> single backup volume has made me a bit uneasy about one of our
> production bacula servers.
>
> We have one system with two tape libraries (so no sin
Hi folks,
the recent talk here of a bug relating to concurrent writes to a
single backup volume has made me a bit uneasy about one of our
production bacula servers.
We have one system with two tape libraries (so no single volume is
used by two backups at the same time), however the other system
--- John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, a number of my questions regarding using VSS, OpenSSL encryption
> and
> > rescue CDs has gone unanswered, does noone have experience with these
> or
> > have I offended someone? I'm trying to Google and read the manual as
> much
> > as possib
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Foo Bar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to the manual, you need to create more devices for concurrent
> backups to disk since Bacula regards everything as tapes, so a single
> Device will block until each individual job to it is finished.
I don't use disks, but bacula regards disk
> BTW, a number of my questions regarding using VSS, OpenSSL encryption and
> rescue CDs has gone unanswered, does noone have experience with these or
> have I offended someone? I'm trying to Google and read the manual as much
> as possible before giving up and posing the question here, if the answ
Hi,
according to the manual, you need to create more devices for concurrent
backups to disk since Bacula regards everything as tapes, so a single
Device will block until each individual job to it is finished.
I'm a little unclear on what new sections I need though, presumable a
number of 'Device
On Friday 18 November 2005 17:11, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Quoting Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > When it locks up, please get me a traceback as described in the
> > Kaboom chapter
> > of the manual. Make sure you do not strip the binaries during
> > installation so that the symbol t
Quoting Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
When it locks up, please get me a traceback as described in the
Kaboom chapter
of the manual. Make sure you do not strip the binaries during installation
so that the symbol tables will be accessible ...
It doesn't happen very often, but when it does,
On Thursday 17 November 2005 22:44, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Quoting Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You have multiple storage devices with the same Media Type pointing to
> > the same directory, which means that if you run concurrent jobs, you can
> > have two threads writing to the s
Quoting Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You have multiple storage devices with the same Media Type pointing to the
same directory, which means that if you run concurrent jobs, you can have two
threads writing to the same file (Device:Volume), each with a different i/o
packet (Device) thinking
You have multiple storage devices with the same Media Type pointing to the
same directory, which means that if you run concurrent jobs, you can have two
threads writing to the same file (Device:Volume), each with a different i/o
packet (Device) thinking it "owns" the volume. This will result in
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Daniel Holtkamp wrote:
Hi !
Luke Dean wrote:
Last month I reported a problem where my system would hang whenever I ran
multiple concurrent jobs that backup to a single RAID array after upgrading
from bacula 1.36.2 to 1.36.3. This problem still persists in 1.38.1.
I`
Hi !
Luke Dean wrote:
Last month I reported a problem where my system would hang whenever I
ran multiple concurrent jobs that backup to a single RAID array after
upgrading from bacula 1.36.2 to 1.36.3. This problem still persists in
1.38.1.
I`m still using 1.37.40 but since you seem to hav
Last month I reported a problem where my system would hang whenever I ran
multiple concurrent jobs that backup to a single RAID array after
upgrading from bacula 1.36.2 to 1.36.3. This problem still persists in
1.38.1.
I've got one director, four clients, four backup jobs (one per client),
-
From: "Arno Lehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Arunav Mandal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backups
Hello,
Arunav Mandal wrote:
We have 150 clients to backup everynight and I am u
Hello,
Arunav Mandal wrote:
We have 150 clients to backup everynight and I am using 1TB as spool. All
setup is on linux. I can see now only one client is doing backups at any
given time. How can I do multiple backups at same time.
First: Multiple concurrent jobs work here, so I assume they c
al Message -
From: "Thomas Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Arunav Mandal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backups
Arunav Mandal wrote:
We have 150 clients to backup everynight a
Arunav Mandal wrote:
> We have 150 clients to backup everynight and I am using 1TB as spool. All
> setup is on linux. I can see now only one client is doing backups at any
> given time. How can I do multiple backups at same time.
You need job concurrency on the Storage daemon and the Director se
Arunav Mandal wrote:
We have 150 clients to backup everynight and I am using 1TB as spool. All
setup is on linux. I can see now only one client is doing backups at any
given time. How can I do multiple backups at same time.
Do you have "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" set?. In bacula-dir.conf this
n
We have 150 clients to backup everynight and I am using 1TB as spool. All
setup is on linux. I can see now only one client is doing backups at any
given time. How can I do multiple backups at same time.
--
Arunav Mandal - amandal at trolltech.com
---
45 matches
Mail list logo
