Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Mindaugas
> > Exactly how written? Without resolving first? It looks like that from the > > test but I want to be sure. > > Please read the manual. There are features in Bacula for dealing with > multiple addresses. If you don't understand what you read, please ask the You mean SDAddresses in Storag

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 04 May 2006 12:58, Mindaugas wrote: > > > OK. So how to resolve this issue? > > > > I don't do anything as complicated as you are doing, so I'm not sure, but > > it > > > seems to me that you can define a name rather than an IP address that is > > used > > > and that is correctly reso

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 04 May 2006 11:39, Mindaugas wrote: > > > Enter SQL query: select * from storage; > > > +---+-+-+ > > > > > > | storageid | name| autochanger | > > > > > > +---+-+-+ > > > > > > | 1 | File

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Mindaugas
> > Enter SQL query: select * from storage; > > +---+-+-+ > > > > | storageid | name| autochanger | > > > > +---+-+-+ > > > > | 1 | File| 0 | > > | 2 | bh1-sd |

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 04 May 2006 09:32, Mindaugas wrote: > > Does your autochanger normally change tapes OK? Has it definitely worked > > since you upgraded to 1.38.8? > > Yes it worked normally. Also I did not encounter such behaviour in > version 1.36.x I used before. > > > Bacula looks for the appendab

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 04 May 2006 09:40, Mindaugas wrote: > > You can see what Storage resource the StorageId corresponds to by doing: > > > > sql > > select * from Storage; > > > > > > The StorageId field was added to handle multiple autochangers at the same > > time > > > -- otherwise one gets "conflic

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Mindaugas
> You can see what Storage resource the StorageId corresponds to by doing: > > sql > select * from Storage; > > > The StorageId field was added to handle multiple autochangers at the same time > -- otherwise one gets "conflicts" with slot numbers. Aha. There may be the issue. As you see I h

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Mindaugas
> Does your autochanger normally change tapes OK? Has it definitely worked > since you upgraded to 1.38.8? Yes it worked normally. Also I did not encounter such behaviour in version 1.36.x I used before. > Bacula looks for the appendable volume with the lowest media ID which is > why it asked

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, If you upgraded from an older Bacula, and have not recently done an "update slots", your catalog database probably does not have a storageid associated with your autochanger. This can be checked by doing the following: llist volume=xxx where xxx is one of the appendable volumes in y

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-04 Thread Troy Daniels
Hi, Does your autochanger normally change tapes OK? Has it definitely worked since you upgraded to 1.38.8? Bacula looks for the appendable volume with the lowest media ID which is why it asked for the one it did. As you pointed out tho, it should be preferring volumes with inchanger = 1 ov

[Bacula-users] Bacula wants tape not currently in changer

2006-05-03 Thread Mindaugas
Hello, Recently upgraded to Bacula 1.38.8. And today got report that bacula needs tape which currently isn't in the changer. But there are two empty tapes in changer for the Daily pool? If I manually unloaded Daily-02-02 tape and loaded and mounted Daily-02-03 backup went smoothly from the