Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:31:54 +0100, Bruno Friedmann wrote: > Holikar, Sachin (ext) wrote: >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> Please find below the extract from the Bacula website( >> http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Catalog_Maintenance.html#SECTION0024 >> 8 >>

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

set (0.00 sec) > > >>From above it looks like we do satify the point no ii> . But not point > no. i>. i.e. "Filename, you have an index with Key_name "Name" and > Sub_part "255". > Will it make any major difference ?? > > Thanks. > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

quot;Name" and Sub_part "255". Will it make any major difference ?? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Holikar, Sachin (ext) Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2009 08:47 To: Dan Langille; Michael Galloway; Josh Fisher; John Drescher Cc: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

. -Original Message- From: Dan Langille [mailto:d...@langille.org] Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2009 21:58 To: Michael Galloway Cc: John Drescher; Josh Fisher; Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Michael Galloway wrote

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Michael Galloway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:53:13AM -0500, John Drescher wrote: 3. There is no database backup as such. What we do is just take the system level full backup. I usually advise against system level full backups. I recommend a prope

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

> so, would it be considered a 'best practice' to have the catalog database > server that is on > a separate machine that the bacula server? > I have the database on a different server than the director but just not having it on the same raid that you backup the most frequently would be fine. Alt

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:53:13AM -0500, John Drescher wrote: > >> 3. There is no database backup as such. What we do is just take the > >> system level full backup. > >> > > > > I believe he was suggesting that the Bacula catalog database might be stored > > on the same file system that is being

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jean Gobin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > If you're using the default name, Linux/Unix AND using sqlite: > With his data set I hope he is using postgres. sqlite will not cut it. John ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

14, 2009 11:08 AM To: Holikar, Sachin (ext) Cc: Josh Fisher; Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Holikar, Sachin (ext) wrote: > Hello Mr. Fisher, > > I Apologize for misunderstandings. I am newbie for B

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Holikar, Sachin (ext) wrote: > Hello Mr. Fisher, > > I Apologize for misunderstandings. I am newbie for Bacula. > No need to apologize. > > Could you please let me know where can I find the location of the > catalog database which is been set for Bacula? > That

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

. Januar 2009 16:34 To: Holikar, Sachin (ext) Cc: John Drescher; Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed Holikar, Sachin (ext) wrote: > Thanks Mr. Drescher for the reply. > > 1. We will surely give it a try for using latest Bacula version and se

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

>> 3. There is no database backup as such. What we do is just take the >> system level full backup. >> > > I believe he was suggesting that the Bacula catalog database might be stored > on the same file system that is being backed up. Since Bacula must write to > its catalog database frequently dur

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

gt; From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009 16:31 > To: Holikar, Sachin (ext) > Cc: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed > > >> We are using Bacula to take the backups on

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed > We are using Bacula to take the backups onto the Tape Library Fujitsu > FibreCAT Tx48 Library. The bacula version we are using is 2.2.7. > That is a old version. You will get better performance with the current release. > > Pr

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

> We are using Bacula to take the backups onto the Tape Library Fujitsu > FibreCAT Tx48 Library. The bacula version we are using is 2.2.7. > That is a old version. You will get better performance with the current release. > > Problem is we get very slow backup speed , around 50 GB per hour wherea

[Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

Hello All, We are using Bacula to take the backups onto the Tape Library Fujitsu FibreCAT Tx48 Library. The bacula version we are using is 2.2.7. Problem is we get very slow backup speed , around 50 GB per hour whereas in ideal scenario the above mentioned tape library gives 288 GB / Hour tra