Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-23 Thread Rob Gerber
I've been thinking and the conclusion I reached is that it's generally understandable that bacula doesn't fail backup or copy jobs that have failed part uploads. It's also understandable that bacula wouldn't 'fail' an admin job if the admin job ran into trouble in its script. After all, how should

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-23 Thread Rob Gerber
Bill, Awesome. I'll check it out tomorrow. Regards, Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:38 PM Bill Arlofski wrote: > @Rob Gerber, all... > > I have just pushed a new feature which will notify on Cloud jobs with > cloud part transfer errors. > > If there are cl

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-23 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
@Rob Gerber, all... I have just pushed a new feature which will notify on Cloud jobs with cloud part transfer errors. If there are cloud jobs that have part transfer errors, a new banner line will be at the top of the report above the job table telling you how many jobs had cloud transfer erro

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-22 Thread Chris Wilkinson
This is the script I use in a run after clause in the cloud backup job. This does all cloud volumes without bothering to check what went and what didn't. Most of the time it does nothing, just resending parts when there is an upload error. #!/bin/bash #upload to cloud sleep 10 #wait 10secs echo "c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-22 Thread Rob Gerber
replies inline below. A lot of things can affect reliability, and who knows, maybe there are > intermittent issues during backup jobs and cloud > volume part uploads which are out of your control causing some parts to > fail to be uploaded during the backup job itself, but > those issues do not

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-22 Thread Chris Wilkinson
I had exactly that problem with S3/Backblaze. I would sometimes get a "no tomes available" error message. I run a script after to upload the part files for all volumes all over again. The driver seems smart enough to not upload part files that are already there. -Chris- On Fri, 21 Feb 2025, 02:21

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-22 Thread Marcin Haba
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 at 18:01, Rob Gerber wrote: >> What error message did you experience with Amazon driver? > > I saw errors like this: > > 22-Feb 10:28 td-bacula-sd JobId 97: Error: B2-TGU-Inc-0048/part.1 > state=error retry=10/10 size=263 B duration=56s > msg=/opt/bacula/plugins/aws_clo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-22 Thread Rob Gerber
Replies inline below. Regards, Robert Gerber 402-237-8692 r...@craeon.net On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 8:40 PM Marcin Haba wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 03:21, Rob Gerber wrote: > > I'm using the s3 driver instead of the amazon driver. I read that the > new amazon driver is much better than the s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-20 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
On 2/20/25 7:40 PM, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello Rob, What error message did you experience with Amazon driver? For Amazon driver and non-AWS S3 cloud storage in the Cloud configuration resource you need to define the BlobEndpoint directive. Otherwise it will not work. @Rob right on schedule, Marc

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-20 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
On 2/20/25 7:19 PM, Rob Gerber wrote: > Hello, [...snip...] Some parts are failing to upload. I verified with ls that the parts in question still remain on disk (I have set cloud cache to truncate on upload, so only part1 and parts that haven't uploaded should remain). In bconsole I ran 'clou

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-20 Thread Marcin Haba
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 03:21, Rob Gerber wrote: > I'm using the s3 driver instead of the amazon driver. I read that the new > amazon driver is much better than the s3 driver, but in my testing the amazon > driver didn't seem to want to connect to a non-aws server. Hello Rob, What error message

[Bacula-users] Bacula cloud

2025-02-20 Thread Rob Gerber
Hello, Bacula 15.0.2 running on Rocky linux 9.4. I'm setting up a system that I will eventually deploy for a customer. This system is currently in the testing phase and nothing on it matters - yet. I have a set of jobs and resources that write to local file volumes. After the local backup jobs are

[Bacula-users] Bacula-cloud

2023-03-23 Thread Lionel PLASSE
Hello, I've read that Bacula cloud is compliant with S3 cloud buckets so amazon ones. Is there a compliance with OneDrive other than mounting local directory to OneDrive cloud space ? It actually works good with OneDrive --synchronize after a backup as post script . But it could be cool for

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula cloud backup

2020-01-29 Thread Davide Franco
Hello, IMHO, I’m not sure you can perform simultaneous backup jobs to both tape and S3 (please let me know if I’m wrong). I’d suggest maybe to use copy jobs like this 1. Backup to tapes 2. Copy job to S3 bucket based on previous backup on tapes. I don’t have huge experience with copy jobs, hope

[Bacula-users] bacula cloud backup

2020-01-28 Thread Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] via Bacula-users
I have recently upgraded my bacula server to version 9.4.4 and wanted to test the cloud backup feature. Currently we are backing up to LTO7 tapes. Is it possible to set-up bacula to backup both to the tape and to the cloud simultaneously? If so I would appreciate some help with that. Thank you.