Onsdag 31 januar 2007 17:50 skrev Ryan Novosielski:
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> So, I guess in summation, "Nothing to see here," or "What's the
> >> problem?"
> >>
> >> *IANA port list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> >
> > Well, HP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>>>
So, I guess in summation, "Nothing to see here," or "What's the
problem?"
*IANA
Hello Dan,
Thanks. Finally! You have provided the proof straight from HP's own documents
that they do use Bacula registered ports. It also proves that our users know
what they are talking about.
Regards,
Kern
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 17:39, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24,
please read to the bottom before commenting on stuff in the middle. --
Chris H.
Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Chris Hoogendyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> I passed an earlier message from this thread along to my network expert,
>> because we have had some complaints about rec
In response to Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >
> >> So, I guess in summation, "Nothing to see here," or "What's the
> >> problem?"
> >>
> >> *IANA port list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> >
>
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 5:50 pm, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Even so, a very small overlap:
>
> * 9100 TCP port is used for printing. Port numbers 9101 and 9102 are for
> parallel ports 2 and 3 on the three-port HP Jetdirect external print
> servers.
>
> ...and if I'm not mistaken, this is conf
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 16:38, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:28, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
> >> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>> Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which have
> >>> the nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001, 900
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
>> So, I guess in summation, "Nothing to see here," or "What's the
>> problem?"
>>
>> *IANA port list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>
> Well, HP does use those
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> So, I guess in summation, "Nothing to see here," or "What's the
> problem?"
>
> *IANA port list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
Well, HP does use those ports:
http://www.isecom.info/cgi-
local/protocoldb/browse.dsp?search=1&fld1=1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2007 at 16:43, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 1:29 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
Port conflicts are a known annoyance, but maybe it would help to
disseminate the information about Bacula
In response to Chris Hoogendyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> I passed an earlier message from this thread along to my network expert,
> because we have had some complaints about recent HP stuff. I'm only
> casually up on that stuff.
>
> I was surprised by his answer, but not by his depth of k
On 31 Jan 2007 at 16:43, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 1:29 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > > Port conflicts are a known annoyance, but maybe it would help to
> > > disseminate the information about Bacula usage, for example here:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L
On 31 Jan 2007 at 10:38, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
>
>
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:28, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which
> >>> have the nasty habit of using non-registere
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 1:29 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
> > Port conflicts are a known annoyance, but maybe it would help to
> > disseminate the information about Bacula usage, for example here:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>
> The Bacula ports are list
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:28, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
>
>
>> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which have
>>> the nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001, 9002, or
>>> 9003, which can cause disconnects by Ba
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:28, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which have
> > the nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001, 9002, or
> > 9003, which can cause disconnects by Bacula. If you find printers
> > probing
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
> Should the need to introduce incompatible changes in the protocol arise, which
> I guess would be Bacula 3.0, maybe a different set of default ports could be
> considered ? HP networked printers are fairly common.
HP should be prevailed upon to fix it
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which have the
> nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001, 9002, or 9003, which
> can cause disconnects by Bacula. If you find printers probing/using those
> ports, either reconfigure the printers or Bacula
18 matches
Mail list logo
