On Wednesday 31 January 2007 1:29 pm, Dan Langille wrote: > > Port conflicts are a known annoyance, but maybe it would help to > > disseminate the information about Bacula usage, for example here: > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers > > The Bacula ports are listed there.
I stand corrected ... the Bacula ports are 9101-9103, not 9001-9003 as in my original message. Unfortunately, these are also the port used by HP printers. > > Should the need to introduce incompatible changes in the protocol > > arise, which I guess would be Bacula 3.0, maybe a different set of > > default ports could be considered ? HP networked printers are fairly > > common. > > Bacula is registered with IANA, which is the definite source as well > as listed in the protocol database: > > http://www.isecom.info/cgi-local/protocoldb/browse.dsp > > Yes, I know it does not make much difference given that HP did and > does not do the right thing. I think we agree on this. Should the need arise for a protocol change, however, picking another set of ports might be an option. Thank you for your consideration, Davide Bolcioni -- There is no place like /home. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
