The topics for this Status Report are:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Bacula Binaries
3. Windows Binaries
4. macOS Binaries
5. New Services
===
1. Bacula Release Status
The latest Bacula version 13.0.1 was released to Source Forge and to
www.bacula.org. This version includes many enhancement
Thank you Kern for all your efforts over the years and welcome to the
new role Eric.
On 2020-12-10 07:32, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I would like to discuss the following subjects:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Next Major Bacula Version
3. New Bacula Project Manager
===
1. Bacula Release St
Hello,
I would like to discuss the following subjects:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Next Major Bacula Version
3. New Bacula Project Manager
===
1. Bacula Release Status
The latest Bacula version 9.6.7 will be released shortly. This
is a bug fix release that fixes a number of bugs especially
Hello,
It has been a while since the last status report, so it is now time.
I would like to discuss the following subjects:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Bacula Binaries (New)
3. Windows Binaries (more coming)
4. Next Bacula Version
===
1. Bacula Release Status
As probably know, the latest B
Hello,
The last Status Report was in February 2016, so this one is a bit
overdue. That said, I would like to discuss the following subjects:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Windows Binaries
3. Next Bacula Version
4. Bacula Forks
5. The Storage, Visualisation, Cloud (SVC) awards 2016
1. Bacula Re
Hello,
I would like to discuss the following topics:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Next Release
3. Vacation
1. Bacula Release Status
As probably know, the latest release of Bacula version 7.4.0 was
released on 16 January 2016. This will be a quite stable release because
it is based on version
Hello,
This is the second half of the quarterly Bacula Status report.
Unfortunately, certain short term aspects are not very positive for the
project, yet the long term outlook is more promising than ever. If you
prefer to start with the good news, skip further down to the section 2:
1. Short te
Hello,
This is the first half of the quarterly Bacula Status report; the second
half will follow in a separate email.
1. If you like Bacula and you like helping people, you should be aware
that since Bacula Systems is a growing company, there are two Bacula
Systems support positions open. One is
Hello,
I have posted a Bacula Status report to the www.bacula.org site.
It discusses the following items:
1. Bacula Release Status
2. Windows Binaries
3. Bacula Enterprise
4. Vacation
5. Bareos
The following is a link to the report.
http://blog.bacula.org/bacula-status-report-30-august-2014
Hello,
First, I would like to thank all of you who have both on and off the
Bacula lists sent me very kind emails thanking me and encouraging me
in the Bareos affair.
The main purposes of this email are:
1. Bareos
2. Bacula
3. The Bacula Conference
1. Bareos:
The main purpose of this email
Hello,
The main purpose of this Status Report is to wish you a very
good holiday season and a peaceful and prosperous 2014.
Thanks for using Bacula, and thanks for sticking with it :-)
I have recently been working on updating the web site to
have a more modern look thanks to help from a Bacula
c
nounce
Sent: Mon, Nov 25, 2013 5:57 pm
Subject: [Bacula-users] Bacula Status Report
Hello,
I would like to speak to you about the following points:
1. The rumors of the death of Bacula (the Community version)
2. The Bareos fork of Bacula
3. Bacula S
Hello,
On 11/26/2013 11:17 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> Hi Kern.
>
> Thank you for the information and here are some requests for more
> details :)
>
> On 25.11.2013 18:49, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> 2. The Bareos fork of Bacula:
>>
>> Unfortunately, despite the fact that Bareos hired one of the best
>
Hi Kern.
Thank you for the information and here are some requests for more details :)
On 25.11.2013 18:49, Kern Sibbald wrote:
2. The Bareos fork of Bacula:
Unfortunately, despite the fact that Bareos hired one of the best
German Open
Source lawyers , there were a number of serious copyright
Hello,
I would like to speak to you about the following points:
1. The rumors of the death of Bacula (the Community version)
2. The Bareos fork of Bacula
3. Bacula Systems and the FSFE (Free Software Foundation Europe)
4. The future of Bacula (the Community version)
1. The rumors of the death o
Hello Kern,
On 07/23/2010 05:54 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a sort of mini-Bacula status report on the following:
>
> 1. Next release
>
> 2. New release cycle
>
> 3. New bugs tracking database
>
> 4. New Bacula server (www.bacula.org)
>
> 5. New Bacula source distribution se
Thanks for all the work you do, this sounds great. Sounds a lot like the
Fedora Linux release cycle the last time I looked at it. Good luck on moving
to the new server and thanks to UKFast.
Thomas
On Friday 23 July 2010 11:54:03 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a sort of mini-Bacul
Hello,
This is a sort of mini-Bacula status report on the following:
1. Next release
2. New release cycle
3. New bugs tracking database
4. New Bacula server (www.bacula.org)
5. New Bacula source distribution server
1. Next release:
Before the end of August, we will be releasing the next vers
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I would appreciate if beta testers would retest the current SVN. Thanks.
Other than weird-files2 (known glitch due to cp deficiency) it passes
everything fine on Mac OS 10.4. Also passes everything on my fedora 7 test
system.
--
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every
Hello,
As I have mentioned several times, we are nearing the end of stabilizing the
next release (I consider the current 2.1.28 beta pretty good). There are
still a few bugs open on the current code, but they should be resolved
shortly, if they are not already fixed.
What remains is a bit mor
Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> I like SuSE a lot and have been running it and participating in the
> betas for severals years. However, 10.1 has been very problematic.
I agree.
> I would wait until they sort out the package manager problem(s). They
> are getting close. There was a major fix abou
On 29 Jun 2006 at 14:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> sudo -s does a shell. Not sure why people keep suggesting 'sudo bash' --
> any good reason?
I don't know. It assumes bash is installed. Which will not always
be the case. I suggest it not be used. :)
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer lo
On Thursday 29 June 2006 10:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > Well, I suppose...but I've found it quite easy to adapt. I suppose you
> > could say it is more "Mac-ish," in that you have admin accounts that can
> > do priv'ed operations, but really, it is the way sudo was de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sudo -s does a shell. Not sure why people keep suggesting 'sudo bash' --
any good reason?
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.09
Quoting Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wednesday 28 June 2006 21:14, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
[snip]
> Though the more I see of SuSE, the more I am impressed. I had
> thought it would not be suitable for server applications because of
> the lack of SELinux, which I run on my server.
[snip
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 21:14, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:02, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Searching for a new distro is not so easy. Kubuntu treats users as idiots
> > by disabling the root account and giving full sudo privilege to the main
> > user.
>
> Well, I suppose...
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:02, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Searching for a new distro is not so easy. Kubuntu treats users as idiots by
> disabling the root account and giving full sudo privilege to the main user.
Well, I suppose...but I've found it quite easy to adapt. I suppose you could
say it
Hello,
Bacula version 1.38.10:
Well, this version despite careful testing here, turned out to be a rather
disasterous release because there were a lot of users experiencing either a
deadlocked Director (Linux) or Director crashes (FreeBSD). As best I can
tell, this occurs (occurred) on systems
28 matches
Mail list logo
