Kern Sibbald wrote (2016/01/18):
> Yesterday, we released Bacula version 7.4.0.
Hello, thank you very much ;o)
So I have decided that I should finally upgrade my 5.2.12-based backup
site to something newer. So I have upgraded server, then 20+ client
nodes...
And then I have found, that some serv
Hello Randy,
Thanks I made it to San Francisco, now the next step is to Sydney next
Monday.
Thanks for supporting us by purchasing the Windows binaries. :-)
Best regards,
Kern
On 01/24/2016 09:00 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
> Hello Kern,
>
> FYI:
>
> I had already downloaded and ran the personal vers
Hello Kern,
FYI:
I had already downloaded and ran the personal version. And now am proud
to say I have paid for it based on your
response. Glad to help, especially if/when it is affordable!
Also, you should know that the version that is there is already 7.4.0,
my question was more of if there wa
Hello Randy,
On 01/23/2016 11:50 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
> Ran my script yesterday to upgrade all the FD's, took 4 times as long as
> I thought it would!
> All backups running without a hitch, much thanks for a successful
> upgrade! I don't take
> this for granted.
>
> FYI - I am backing up one Wind
Ran my script yesterday to upgrade all the FD's, took 4 times as long as
I thought it would!
All backups running without a hitch, much thanks for a successful
upgrade! I don't take
this for granted.
FYI - I am backing up one Windows VM instance, according to Bacula it
seems we must pay
for a licen
Thanks Kern for the quick response, I'll get around to running
my update script soon, again thanks!
On 1/19/2016 11:39 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> There is generally no reason to upgrade the FDs, but at some point
> certain FD dependent features may not be available so it is advisable
> to upgrade t
Thanks for the update, Kern!
I upgraded my first server (out of five) today from 7.2.0 compling
from source on CentOS 6.x, and so far everything has worked well, ran
a quick backup & restore job but will wait until after the next full
backups over the weekend before upgrading the other instances.
There is generally no reason to upgrade the FDs, but at some point
certain FD dependent features may not be available so it is advisable to
upgrade them when you can.
Best regards,
Kern
On 01/19/2016 03:23 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
> Thanks, installed and running on 2 directors. Tested a few backup
Thanks, installed and running on 2 directors. Tested a few backups,
working fine, thanks again.
Is there any noticeable benefit to updating all the client versions
right away?
On 1/18/2016 9:50 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday, we released Bacula version 7.4.0.
>
> This version consi
> Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
>d...@langille.org
> I'm packaging for FreeBSD now.
I like to install from scratch on Ubuntu Server and try to use the correct
paths, users, permissions, and anything related, etc. by researching the
web. I think I'm getting the hang of it.
But I've also instal
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> New features and changes:
> Please see the New Features chapter of the manual for documentation on
> the new features. The new features are currently only in the New
> Features chapter and have not et been integrated into the main cha
Hello,
Yesterday, we released Bacula version 7.4.0.
This version consists of more backports from Bacula Enterprise 8.4 as
well quite a few bug fixes (28) as a number of new features. For your
convenience, I have included selected parts of the ReleaseNotes below.
Upgrading should be easy since t
12 matches
Mail list logo
