Hello Erik,
Binary packages for Fedora 28 (64 bits) are now available for Bacula 9.2.2.
Best regards
Davide
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:39 AM Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> Will there be binaries for fedora 28 which has been available in more than
> half a year?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Erik P. Olsen
>
>
>
Hello Erik,
Thanks for your question.
Definitively yes, this is something I can do within the next weeks.
I'll let you know when Fedora 28 binary packages will be available.
Best regards
Davide
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> Will there be binaries for fedora 28 whi
Will there be binaries for fedora 28 which has been available in more than half
a year?
--
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http
Hello,
In the Bacula Status Report from 17th March it was mentioned that
binaries for the most common platforms would shortly be available.
I just wondered if there had been any progress on this - or maybe I
have missed where these binaries are located?
Thanks,
Richard
---
On Tuesday 2016-11-29 11:46:00 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 06:04 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > I will have to get some time to study bsr files and their usage.
> > Shame on me for failing to do so years ago.
>
> No problem, nothing lost and possibly more to gain by studing bsr usage
> now.
On Tuesday 2016-11-29 11:50:37 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Well, we are packaging Bacula in rpms and debs, so we get everything
> you cite below. In addition, we get very easy backup and restore in a
> disaster situation.
Yes and I am grateful for the provided packages.
Although in my current company
Well, we are packaging Bacula in rpms and debs, so we get everything you
cite below. In addition, we get very easy backup and restore in a
disaster situation.
Everyone can do as he wishes, in fact, if you want to take our packages
with their binaries and other files and repackage them to spray
On 11/29/2016 06:04 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> On Monday 2016-11-28 18:45:10 Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> On 11/28/2016 01:33 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
>>> For the disaster recovery I am starting with the premise that
>>> everything is lost except the volumes in the secondary backup
>>> storage. From th
Ah, yet another good argument for a single directory installation :-)
Thanks,
Kern
On 11/28/2016 07:25 PM, Josh Fisher wrote:
>
> On 11/28/2016 12:43 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello Josip,
>>
>> Well for end users such as myself, I do consider having Bacula all over
>> your system a problem. Fi
On Monday 2016-11-28 18:43:14 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Josip,
>
> Well for end users such as myself, I do consider having Bacula all over
> your system a problem. First, if I want to bring up a new version, I
> simply do:
>
> cp -a /opt/bacula /opt/old-bacula
> save the database
>
> then in
On Monday 2016-11-28 18:45:10 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 01:33 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > For the disaster recovery I am starting with the premise that
> > everything is lost except the volumes in the secondary backup
> > storage. From those volumes using the bextract tool I am able to
On 11/28/2016 12:43 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Josip,
>
> Well for end users such as myself, I do consider having Bacula all over
> your system a problem. First, if I want to bring up a new version, I
> simply do:
>
> cp -a /opt/bacula /opt/old-bacula
> save the database
>
> then install a n
On 11/28/2016 01:33 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> On Monday 2016-11-28 12:22:36 Jaime Ferrer Hepp wrote:
>> Yes, you are correct. But having all under /opt/bacula ease the process
>> of disaster recovery, despite the fact that location of files varies
>> depending on the distribution.
>
> For the di
Hello Josip,
Well for end users such as myself, I do consider having Bacula all over
your system a problem. First, if I want to bring up a new version, I
simply do:
cp -a /opt/bacula /opt/old-bacula
save the database
then install a new version. If something goes wrong, it is easy to roll
ba
On 2016-11-28 02:59, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Many thanks, but the issue is not the spec or deb files. We have
> those. The problem
> is that the standard distributions spray Bacula files all over your
> system, and
> they spray them in different places.
You might want to take a look at snap packag
On Monday 2016-11-28 12:22:36 Jaime Ferrer Hepp wrote:
> Yes, you are correct. But having all under /opt/bacula ease the process
> of disaster recovery, despite the fact that location of files varies
> depending on the distribution.
For the disaster recovery I am starting with the premise that e
]
Enviado el: lunes, 28 de noviembre de 2016 9:11
Para: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Binaries
On Monday 2016-11-28 11:56:25 Jaime Ferrer Hepp wrote:
> Thanks Josip, I 'll take a look into it. Mainly what might be helpful
> is to have bacula-fd binar
On Monday 2016-11-28 11:56:25 Jaime Ferrer Hepp wrote:
> Thanks Josip, I 'll take a look into it. Mainly what might be helpful is
> to have bacula-fd binaries for the different linux distributions and
> version. Regarding bacula-dir and bacula-sd I prefer to use Kern's
> suggestion to have all file
Thanks Kern for your reply. I’m looking forward to it.
Jaime Ferrer Hepp
De: Kern Sibbald [mailto:k...@sibbald.com]
Enviado el: sábado, 26 de noviembre de 2016 6:01
Para: Jaime Ferrer Hepp; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Binaries
Hello,
We are working on
he "RedHat standard" and it
is really cumbersome to maintain and update.
Jaime Ferrer Hepp
Ingesoft Ltda.
-Mensaje original-
De: Josip Deanovic [mailto:djosip+n...@linuxpages.net]
Enviado el: domingo, 27 de noviembre de 2016 12:02
Para: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunt
Many thanks, but the issue is not the spec or deb files. We have
those. The problem
is that the standard distributions spray Bacula files all over your
system, and
they spray them in different places. This makes it *very* hard to support,
and hard to do backups of Bacula itself. Bacula uses i
On Saturday 2016-11-26 10:00:39 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are working on it. Many of the binaries are already prepared, but
> the project is being held up because I must first finish an important
> programming task, then organize the upload and the hard part is making
> both deb and rpm
Hello,
We are working on it. Many of the binaries are already prepared,
but the project is being held up because I must first finish an
important programming task, then organize the upload and the hard
part is making both deb and rpm based repos (probably
Hi Guys;
Does anyone knows when the bacula binaries for major linux distributions will
be available. I'm planning to upgrade Bacula to the lastes version, but I will
want to skip the compilation process.
Thanks
Jaime Ferrer
--
--- On Fri, 1/2/09, James Cort wrote:
> From: James Cort
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula binaries for mac?
> To: hj...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "baculausers"
> Date: Friday, January 2, 2009, 7:47 AM
> Hemant Shah wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> >
Hemant Shah wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Is there a compiled version of bacula for Mac available anywhere?
> I have g4, g5 and intel Macs. I can probably compile bacula on powerpc mac
> because I have xcode installed on one of the systems. I would have to install
> on xcode on my sons laptop (intel)
--- On Wed, 12/31/08, Rowdy wrote:
> From: Rowdy
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula binaries for mac?
> To: hj...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "baculausers"
> Date: Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 3:57 PM
> Hemant Shah wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Is there a
Hemant Shah wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Is there a compiled version of bacula for Mac available anywhere?
> I have g4, g5 and intel Macs. I can probably compile bacula on powerpc mac
> because I have xcode installed on one of the systems. I would have to install
> on xcode on my sons laptop (intel)
Folks,
Is there a compiled version of bacula for Mac available anywhere?
I have g4, g5 and intel Macs. I can probably compile bacula on powerpc mac
because I have xcode installed on one of the systems. I would have to install
on xcode on my sons laptop (intel) which I would rather not do.
I
29 matches
Mail list logo
