On 11/29/2016 06:04 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote: > On Monday 2016-11-28 18:45:10 Kern Sibbald wrote: >> On 11/28/2016 01:33 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote: >>> For the disaster recovery I am starting with the premise that >>> everything is lost except the volumes in the secondary backup >>> storage. From those volumes using the bextract tool I am able to get >>> the bacula server up and running. >> For me it is easier to use the .bsr file that Bacula emails me each >> evening to get back the complete Bacula environment. No need to use >> bextract. > I have them copied to the secondary location using admin job every > morning after all backups are done but I didn't use them because I > am not fully familiar with the bsr files (although I understand their > format otherwise I wouldn't be able to use bextract to specify a > specific job). > > I will have to get some time to study bsr files and their usage. > Shame on me for failing to do so years ago.
No problem, nothing lost and possibly more to gain by studing bsr usage now. On my side, I made one mistake above in writing "No need to use bextract". Well, in fact I do use bextract to get everything back but with a .bsr file sent by email, or I do use a Bacula already installed on another machine to restore using the bsr file. Best regards, Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
