>On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:48:28 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>23.07.2007 23:36,, George R.Kasica wrote::
>>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:08:36 +0200, you wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 23.07.2007 20:33,, George R.Kasica wrote::
Hello:
I'm sure this is a simple fix, but I'm missing something in the
Hi,
23.07.2007 23:36,, George R.Kasica wrote::
>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:08:36 +0200, you wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 23.07.2007 20:33,, George R.Kasica wrote::
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> I'm sure this is a simple fix, but I'm missing something in the
>>> details...
>>>
>>> I have a working configuration here
>On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:08:36 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>23.07.2007 20:33,, George R.Kasica wrote::
>> Hello:
>>
>> I'm sure this is a simple fix, but I'm missing something in the
>> details...
>>
>> I have a working configuration here with the latest stable release of
>> bacula here using 3 tape
Hi,
23.07.2007 20:33,, George R.Kasica wrote::
> Hello:
>
> I'm sure this is a simple fix, but I'm missing something in the
> details...
>
> I have a working configuration here with the latest stable release of
> bacula here using 3 tape drives to backup 4 systems. What I need some
> help with i
Hello:
I'm sure this is a simple fix, but I'm missing something in the
details...
I have a working configuration here with the latest stable release of
bacula here using 3 tape drives to backup 4 systems. What I need some
help with is making it a bit more efficient.
Currently it works as follows