Dan Langille wrote:
> Pascal Clermont wrote:
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>> Pascal Clermont wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the archives and stumbled upon "[Bacula-users]
Improving Backup speed" thread which caught my eye since I am having
issues.
we backup over 6TB of small files dur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pascal Clermont wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Pascal Clermont wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I was reading the archives and stumbled upon "[Bacula-users]
>>> Improving Backup speed" thread which caught my ey
Dan Langille wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Pascal Clermont wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was reading the archives and stumbled upon "[Bacula-users] Improving
>> Backup speed" thread which caught my eye since I am having issues.
>> we backup over 6TB of small files during a ful
Pascal Clermont wrote:
> Hi,
> I was reading the archives and stumbled upon "[Bacula-users] Improving Backup
> speed" thread which caught my eye since I am having issues.
> we backup over 6TB of small files during a full usually started on Friday
> night these are far from being finished on Monda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pascal Clermont wrote:
> Hi,
> I was reading the archives and stumbled upon "[Bacula-users] Improving Backup
> speed" thread which caught my eye since I am having issues.
> we backup over 6TB of small files during a full usually started on Friday
> n
Hi,
I was reading the archives and stumbled upon "[Bacula-users] Improving Backup
speed" thread which caught my eye since I am having issues.
we backup over 6TB of small files during a full usually started on Friday night
these are far from being finished on Mondays. the transfer on the wire is
John Drescher schrieb:
>> I have set up a new Backups System and I don't know whether the
>> performance is good or not.
>> So I hope you can tell me a little bit more :-)
>> I am using a LTO4 Autoloader with 2 drives. It is connected to a Debian
>> Backup Server trough an PCI-X SCSI Card (U320).
> I have set up a new Backups System and I don't know whether the
> performance is good or not.
> So I hope you can tell me a little bit more :-)
> I am using a LTO4 Autoloader with 2 drives. It is connected to a Debian
> Backup Server trough an PCI-X SCSI Card (U320).
> This Server has another int
Stefan Lubitz schrieb:
> [...]
> 08-Oct 22:06 BACKUP3-sd JobId 10: Job write elapsed time = 06:26:12,
> Transfer rate = 70.36 M bytes/second
The job is writing with 70.36 MB/s to the spool device, which seems to
be ok to me.
> [...]
> 09-Oct 04:53 BACKUP3-sd JobId 10: Despooling elapsed time = 0
Hi all,
I have set up a new Backups System and I don't know whether the
performance is good or not.
So I hope you can tell me a little bit more :-)
I am using a LTO4 Autoloader with 2 drives. It is connected to a Debian
Backup Server trough an PCI-X SCSI Card (U320).
This Server has another inte
On Friday 08 April 2005 16:31, Francesco wrote:
> I've got a 100Mb network, and after few attempts i saw in bacula's stats:
>
> Rate: 279.5 KB/s
>
> Isn't it too slow ??
Depends on the situation, network traffic, the machines activity (both of
them) hard disc speed and a bit o
I've got a 100Mb network, and after few attempts i saw in bacula's stats:
Rate: 279.5 KB/s
Isn't it too slow ??
Can i impose the bandwith usage?
--
I've got only a big hdd (220G): can i run multiple backups simultaneously on
the same hdd? I think yes, but i can't under
12 matches
Mail list logo
