Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved with ugly hack)

2006-05-12 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 5/11/2006 4:46 AM, Gregory Brauer wrote: Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 5/9/2006 7:37 PM, Gregory Brauer wrote: Gregory Brauer wrote: I believe I can get the behavior I want by setting all of my volumes as InChanger=1 and never running update slots again. I didn't follow this thr

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved with uglyhack)

2006-05-11 Thread Gregory Brauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Gregory & Brauer, I circumvented this issue in 1.36 using the following technique: We have an autoloader that has tapes changed every day. Prior to running the scheduled jobs for the night the first job (with high priority so it runs first) is an admin job that uses

RE: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved with uglyhack)

2006-05-11 Thread brett.dellegrazie
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gregory Brauer Sent: 11 May 2006 03:46 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Arno Lehmann Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved with uglyhack) Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/9/2006 7:37 P

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved with ugly hack)

2006-05-10 Thread Gregory Brauer
Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 5/9/2006 7:37 PM, Gregory Brauer wrote: Gregory Brauer wrote: I believe I can get the behavior I want by setting all of my volumes as InChanger=1 and never running update slots again. I didn't follow this thread, but what behaviour would that be? Should probably

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved with ugly hack)

2006-05-10 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Gregory Brauer wrote: This just seems broken to me, though. Bacula should automatically check what tapes are currently in the loader every time it runs a job. Why doesn't it do this? Because if the tapes aren't barcoded, this requires reading the labels. AB --

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved with ugly hack)

2006-05-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 5/9/2006 7:37 PM, Gregory Brauer wrote: Gregory Brauer wrote: I believe I can get the behavior I want by setting all of my volumes as InChanger=1 and never running update slots again. I didn't follow this thread, but what behaviour would that be? I use two autochangers and tapes in t

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved with ugly hack)

2006-05-09 Thread Gregory Brauer
Gregory Brauer wrote: I believe I can get the behavior I want by setting all of my volumes as InChanger=1 and never running update slots again. I was unable to do this in the Bacula console interface as any time I would mark a volume InChanger=0, it would mark the other volume that was already

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger *almost* working (resolved)

2006-05-08 Thread Gregory Brauer
As usual, the answer was in the documentation: "Bacula will not automatically use a Volume in your autochanger unless it is labeled and the slot number is stored in the catalog and the Volume is marked as InChanger." Because my old loader does not have a barcode reader, "update slots" fails