Re: [Bacula-users] 5.2.x client with 5.0.3 director/storage

2012-01-13 Thread Ben Walton
Excerpts from Dan Langille's message of Sun Jan 01 23:00:41 -0500 2012: Hi Dan, > The general rule for version: Thanks very much for sharing this. I've down-revved the two clients that got a higher version due to the release happening in the middle of a deployment. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Sy

Re: [Bacula-users] 5.2.x client with 5.0.3 director/storage

2012-01-01 Thread Dan Langille
On Dec 13, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote: > Em 12-12-2011 18:41, Ben Walton escreveu: >> >> I don't see a documented item about running a 5.2.1 client with the >> older 5.0.3 director and 5.0.3 storage daemon. (I do see notes about >> doing this version straddle in the opposite directio

Re: [Bacula-users] 5.2.x client with 5.0.3 director/storage

2011-12-13 Thread Marcio Merlone
Em 12-12-2011 18:41, Ben Walton escreveu: I don't see a documented item about running a 5.2.1 client with the older 5.0.3 director and 5.0.3 storage daemon. (I do see notes about doing this version straddle in the opposite direction.) It seems to work but is it a valid configuration? Is there

[Bacula-users] 5.2.x client with 5.0.3 director/storage

2011-12-12 Thread Ben Walton
Hi All, I don't see a documented item about running a 5.2.1 client with the older 5.0.3 director and 5.0.3 storage daemon. (I do see notes about doing this version straddle in the opposite direction.) It seems to work but is it a valid configuration? Is there anything I should know when runnin