On Dec 13, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote: > Em 12-12-2011 18:41, Ben Walton escreveu: >> >> I don't see a documented item about running a 5.2.1 client with the >> older 5.0.3 director and 5.0.3 storage daemon. (I do see notes about >> doing this version straddle in the opposite direction.) It seems to >> work but is it a valid configuration? Is there anything I should know >> when running like this? > > +1 > > I was about to try that. Windows version of bat 5.0.x is broken for me, so I > wanted to try the new version, but had no guts for this... :)
The general rule for version: bacula-dir = bacula-sd (always, always, always, do not violate this rule) bacula-fd <= bacula-dir Thus, you can let the FD lag behind the servers. You can upgrade the servers and not worry about upgrading the clients. However, if you use a newer client, results may be interesting. Try it. See if it works. No promises. -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
