Thanks. I really /appreciate./
Em 24-01-2016 06:51, Kern Sibbald escreveu:
On 01/24/2016 02:20 AM, Marcos Renato da Silva Junior wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 servers as storage daemon (backup on disk), one for each Pool
(Daily / Weekly / Monthly).
There is a problem in this layout?
No, this layout is
On 01/24/2016 02:20 AM, Marcos Renato da Silva Junior wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 3 servers as storage daemon (backup on disk), one for each Pool
> (Daily / Weekly / Monthly).
>
> There is a problem in this layout?
No, this layout is supported, but please make 100% sure that each
Storage daemon has a
Hi,
I have 3 servers as storage daemon (backup on disk), one for each Pool
(Daily / Weekly / Monthly).
There is a problem in this layout?
Thanks.
--
Marcos Renato da Silva Junior
Universidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp
Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira - FEIS
Departamento de Engenharia
Goodnight everyone, I have currently implemented three volumes to the
servers of the company's 1TB HD 2. A full, one incremental and a
differential, so will all full copies to the same volume as well as the full
incremental incremental volume going to the same applies to the differential,
and over
I�m so happy! My new site is wonderful! I hope you�ll like it too...
http://www.zygier.net/page.php?ugoogleId=49tj7
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organi
Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> I really have to thank you and Dan again!
>> I was talking to a colleague of mine this afternoon, telling him I was
>> going to ask the mailing list about this issue. And I told him about
>> these two bacula experts that are extremely active on the list, from
>> whom I hoped
Hi,
08.02.2008 22:20, Philipp Geschke wrote:
> Arno Lehmann schrieb:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi :)
> Thanks for answering!
>
>> Ok, just to make sure I understand correctly: You back up to file volumes?
> Exactly. Diskspace is getting way too cheap ;-)
Well... personally, I *like* tape, but I still see the
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
> Hi,
Hi :)
Thanks for answering!
> Ok, just to make sure I understand correctly: You back up to file volumes?
Exactly. Diskspace is getting way too cheap ;-)
>> Now my question is, how would you accomplish this?
>
> rsync.
Feel's good to hear rsync twice, because this is
Hi,
08.02.2008 21:10, Philipp Geschke wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have a nice backupserver running with bacula, tls and pki encryption
> and everything set up, which works great! But!
>
> I'm struggling with this question for quite a few weeks now, without
> being able to find a solution that
Philipp Geschke wrote:
> Dan, thanks for your answer!
>
> Dan Langille schrieb:
>> Why just Client1? Why not all your backups?
> It'll be a pretty high load, we're talking cross continent connections
> (at least for ServerC) and a couple hundreds of GB per day. That's why I
> prioritize some of t
Dan, thanks for your answer!
Dan Langille schrieb:
> Why just Client1? Why not all your backups?
It'll be a pretty high load, we're talking cross continent connections
(at least for ServerC) and a couple hundreds of GB per day. That's why I
prioritize some of them.
>> Now my question is, how wou
Philipp Geschke wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have a nice backupserver running with bacula, tls and pki encryption
> and everything set up, which works great! But!
>
> I'm struggling with this question for quite a few weeks now, without
> being able to find a solution that feels "right".
>
> I w
Dear list,
I have a nice backupserver running with bacula, tls and pki encryption
and everything set up, which works great! But!
I'm struggling with this question for quite a few weeks now, without
being able to find a solution that feels "right".
I want to achieve a 3 Level Off-Site Backup.
an information system for the
> purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002."
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
> Lehmann
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 June 2006 12:36 p.m.
> To: bacula-users@li
sactions Act 2002."
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
> Lehmann
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 June 2006 12:36 p.m.
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] 3 running processes of f
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno
Lehmann
Sent: Tuesday, 20 June 2006 12:36 p.m.
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] 3 running processes of fd daemon.
Hi,
On 6/20/2006 1:48 AM, Norbert Murzsa wrote:
> Ok. Thank you.
> So the question again.
>
> Why does Bacul
munication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that
> this communication does not designate an information system for the
> purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002."
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Frank Sweetser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
s Act 2002."
-Original Message-
From: Frank Sweetser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 19 June 2006 12:37 p.m.
To: Norbert Murzsa
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] 3 running processes of fd daemon.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:43:22AM +1200, Norbert Murzsa w
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Frank Sweetser wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:43:22AM +1200, Norbert Murzsa wrote:
>> After a successful building I have one running process on RHEL3 and
>> RHEL4 but I have three running processes on RH 7.3.
>
> They're not actually three seperate processes - they're thr
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:43:22AM +1200, Norbert Murzsa wrote:
> After a successful building I have one running process on RHEL3 and
> RHEL4 but I have three running processes on RH 7.3.
They're not actually three seperate processes - they're three threads in the
same process. Check the man page
Tested versions (built from source):
1.38.6
1.38.10
After a successful building I have one running process on
RHEL3 and RHEL4 but I have three running processes on RH 7.3.
Everything works fine (the communication is good) but I can’t
understand why are these three processes on RH 7.3
On Monday 16 January 2006 21:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> With 2.4 Linux kernels (with a few exceptions), each thread had a
> separate pid. On 2.6 Linux kernels, all threads share the same pid but
> have different thread ids.
Rats, why didn't I think of that. Of course that bit me once before when
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 10:40, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:01:13 +0100, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
>
> Kern> On Monday 16 January 2006 20:19, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:44:02 +0100, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> >> > <[E
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:01:13 +0100, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Kern> On Monday 16 January 2006 20:19, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:44:02 +0100, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
Pascal> Yes! it desappeared on /etc/init.d
On Monday 16 January 2006 20:19, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:44:02 +0100, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Pascal> Yes! it desappeared on /etc/init.d/bacula
> Pascal> Is it in relation with the number of storage configured?
> Pascal> The probl
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:44:02 +0100, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Pascal> Yes! it desappeared on /etc/init.d/bacula
Pascal> Is it in relation with the number of storage configured?
Pascal> The problem is that i think my jobs fail because the thead concurently
P
Yes! it desappeared on /etc/init.d/bacula
Is it in relation with the number of storage configured?
The problem is that i think my jobs fail because the thead concurently
lock the nst0 device:
fuser -uv /dev/nst0
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/nst0root 302
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Monday 16 January 2006 16:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I use debian sarge. When i lauch bacula (/etc/init.d/bacula-sd start) i
>> obtains 4 threads
[...]
>> I wanted to obtain only one (as it is in my other machine with b
On Monday 16 January 2006 16:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use debian sarge. When i lauch bacula (/etc/init.d/bacula-sd start) i
> obtains 4 threads
> # pgrep -l bacula
> 30232 bacula-sd
> 30233 bacula-sd
> 30234 bacula-sd
> 30235 bacula-sd
> I wanted to obtain only one (as it is in my other mac
Hi,
I use debian sarge. When i lauch bacula (/etc/init.d/bacula-sd start) i
obtains 4 threads
# pgrep -l bacula
30232 bacula-sd
30233 bacula-sd
30234 bacula-sd
30235 bacula-sd
I wanted to obtain only one (as it is in my other machine with bacula).
Is somebody knowing where is the parameter which co
30 matches
Mail list logo
