Mandi! Udo Kaune
In chel di` si favelave...
> The more important part is if you encrypt by software you should also
> compress by software beforehand.
Clear. I've done some tests, and clearly today, for mixed data, compression
does not achive big improvement, so i've decided to do software enc
Am 18.02.25 um 17:36 schrieb Marco Gaiarin:
...i can confirm that debian bacula from buster onward support encryption,
i'm using it.
But... Interesting aproach 'stenc'...
The more important part is if you encrypt by software you should also compress
by software beforehand. That even more dr
Am 17.02.25 um 14:14 schrieb Adam Weremczuk:
Does Bacula 9.6.7 (from Debian 11 repository) likely support backups encryption
out of the box?
Or do I need to compile it with ./configure --with-openssl ?
How do I check if encryption is currently available?
I'm using it with LTO-8 ULTRIUM-HH8 ex
Mandi! Rob Gerber
In chel di` si favelave...
> I don't know for sure how to check if the default binaries supplied by
> Debian support encryption out of the box. I would suspect that the packages
> support SSL since that is a secure default.
...i can confirm that debian bacula from buster onwar
Adam,
I don't know for sure how to check if the default binaries supplied by
Debian support encryption out of the box. I would suspect that the packages
support SSL since that is a secure default.
I do advise that you consider adding the bacula community repository and
using a newer version of ba
Am 17.02.25 um 14:14 schrieb Adam Weremczuk:
Does Bacula 9.6.7 (from Debian 11 repository) likely support backups
encryption out of the box?
Or do I need to compile it with ./configure --with-openssl ?
How do I check if encryption is currently available?
I'm using it with LTO-8 ULTRIUM-HH8 ex
Does Bacula 9.6.7 (from Debian 11 repository) likely support backups
encryption out of the box?
Or do I need to compile it with ./configure --with-openssl ?
How do I check if encryption is currently available?
I'm using it with LTO-8 ULTRIUM-HH8 external tape drive.
---
Adam
___
Zitat von Axel Rau :
> Am 15.01.2013 um 23:05 schrieb Axel Rau:
>
>> Files backed up with
>> readfifo = yes
>> seem to be backed up fine:
>> ---
>> Software Compression: None
>> VSS:no
>> Encryption: yes
>> Accurate: no
>> Volume name(s):
Am 15.01.2013 um 23:05 schrieb Axel Rau:
> Files backed up with
> readfifo = yes
> seem to be backed up fine:
> ---
> Software Compression: None
> VSS:no
> Encryption: yes
> Accurate: no
> Volume name(s): DB1-DB-DAILY-0120
> Volu
Files backed up with
readfifo = yes
seem to be backed up fine:
---
Software Compression: None
VSS:no
Encryption: yes
Accurate: no
Volume name(s): DB1-DB-DAILY-0120
Volume Session Id: 15
Volume Session Time:135819
Hey guys,
I've seen this question a few times in the archives but can't find anything
that matches my situation.
I have configured encryption on all my file daemons (added the four PKI options
to each with separate keys for each fd)
I have no errors on startup or showing in the logs, all backu
On Nov 17, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
>> On Nov 16, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> after I set up TLS successfully, I tried to get data encryption
>>> running.
>>>
>>> I started with the official documentation:
>>>
>>> http://www.bacula.org/en/
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 2011-11-17 09:18, Manuel Schleiffelder wrote:
> > On 2011-11-16 18:31, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Hi list,
> >
> >> after I set up TLS successfully, I tried to get data encryption
> >> running.
> >
> >> I started with the official
> On Nov 16, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > after I set up TLS successfully, I tried to get data encryption
> > running.
> >
> > I started with the official documentation:
> >
> > http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Encryption.html\
>
>
> I do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-17 09:18, Manuel Schleiffelder wrote:
> On 2011-11-16 18:31, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi list,
>
>> after I set up TLS successfully, I tried to get data encryption
>> running.
>
>> I started with the official documentation:
>
>> http:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-16 18:31, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> after I set up TLS successfully, I tried to get data encryption
> running.
>
> I started with the official documentation:
>
> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Encryption.ht
On Nov 16, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> after I set up TLS successfully, I tried to get data encryption running.
>
> I started with the official documentation:
>
> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Encryption.html\
I do not know the cause of the p
Hi list,
after I set up TLS successfully, I tried to get data encryption running.
I started with the official documentation:
http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Encryption.html
ldd `which bacula-fd` shows:
...
libssl.so.0.9.8 => /lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x00673000)
libcrypto.so.0.9
Vincent J wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Need some help with the Data Encryption of a Windows client FD. I've been
> looking
> through the list of archive emails of bacula-users list for some references
> as well as
> suggestions. Issue: I'm using Win32 2.4.2 version, I've commented out the
>
Hi All,
Need some help with the Data Encryption of a Windows client FD. I've been
looking
through the list of archive emails of bacula-users list for some references
as well as
suggestions. Issue: I'm using Win32 2.4.2 version, I've commented out the
configurations
that I use for t
Hi all,
sorry, but I didn't know about the oppenssl Tool for Windows.
I installed that tool and made the same configuration as on Linux and...
...it works
Daniel
>Hi,
>
>is it possible to work with data encryption on a bacula-fd for Windows XP?
>
>I couldn't find any entries in the list or in
Hi,
is it possible to work with data encryption on a bacula-fd for Windows XP?
I couldn't find any entries in the list or in the documentation.
I am testing a Bacula Server 2.0.3 on Debian Etch
My Clients are Linux and Windows.
The Data Encryption on Linux seams to work well.
Thanks for your an
On Sep 4, 2006, at 11:35, Lech Karol Pawłaszek wrote:
Hello bacula users!
I wonder if any of you have tried to encrypt your data (on a client-
side)
using a symmetric algorithm (like AES). I know that -beta can
perform signing
and encrypting data using asymmetric RSA keys, but AFAIK it's mu
Hi Vladimir,
Thanks for sharing that solution. Much appreciated.
Erich
On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Vladimir Doisan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> BTW, forgot to mention, I've used symmetric encryption on clients with
> AxCrypt utility (does AES128 encryption and co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BTW, forgot to mention, I've used symmetric encryption on clients with
AxCrypt utility (does AES128 encryption and compression)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/axcrypt with success. However I moved to
Bacula/GnuPG combo because I can manage it centrall
Hi Lech Karol
The only sure way to encrypt data right now is to encrypt it on the
server (you could have 3rd party encryption on the client, but it gets
messy). Basically when I finish backing up the clients with Bacula, I
execute "RunAfter" script which uses GnuPG with public key to encrypt
the vo
Hello bacula users!
I wonder if any of you have tried to encrypt your data (on a client-side)
using a symmetric algorithm (like AES). I know that -beta can perform signing
and encrypting data using asymmetric RSA keys, but AFAIK it's much more time
expensive way to encrypt data. And encrypting
27 matches
Mail list logo
